Feeds

Cisco staff buy rival kit on Amazon

Drones get value in Linksys boxes

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

Updated Cisco staffers are buying competitors' products from Amazon.com.

A record of people giving Cisco email addresses in purchases with Amazon.com (which is available via a feature called "Purchase Circles") reveals that the top-selling electronics product is a Cable/DSL router from Linksys. Three of the top eight products listed in the section are non-Cisco products.

Now in fairness to Cisco it should be pointed out that Amazon.com doesn't sell its kit, but the question still arises: why are some (a few? Many?) Cisco employees looking beyond Borg Central for their DSL hardware.

It couldn't be the patchy security record of (lower-end) Cisco 600 series DSL routers, which perform the same function as the Linksys kit? Surely not. ®

Updated again:
Since we wrote this story many Register readers, including a number from Cisco, have written to tell us that the Linksys BEFSR41 Etherfast 4-Port Cable/DSL Router (the top selling Amazon product) is misnamed as a DSL router really, and certainly doesn't compete with Cisco's 600 series SOHO DSL router.

The Linksys box is an Ethernet to Ethernet routers with firewall, Network Address Translation, PPP over Ethernet and a 4-port switch. Its closest Cisco equivalent would be the recently introduced Cisco 806, which we hear, is harder to use.

Broadband service providers charge an extra monthly fee for multiple computers. Many Cisco employees, we are told, use network address translation to do this for free. This requires an additional network device like the Linksys or CiscoCisco 600as well as a device to terminate the connection. The Cisco 806 costs $650.00 normally (or $130 to staff with a 80 per cent discount we're told they get) so its still more expensive than the Linksys box (which is less than $100 from Amazon.com).

Prior to Rythms Netconnections bankruptcy, Cisco home users were using Rythms with Cisco 675 routers.

For cable modem access, it's cheaper to buy a consumer device (which Cisco does not sell) and a Linksys router than a Cisco business class cable modem.

We hope this helps clear things up.

Related Stories

Multiple flaws in Cisco router software exposed
Cisco 600 routers offer cracker fun

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

More from The Register

next story
MEN WANTED to satisfy town full of yearning BRAZILIAN HOTNESS
'Prettier, better organised, more harmonious than if men were in charge'
Cops baffled by riddle of CHICKEN who crossed ROAD
'Officers were unable to determine Chicken's intent'
Yes, but what are your plans if a DRAGON attacks?
Local UK gov outs most ridiculous FoI requests...
Drunkards warned: If you can't walk in a straight line, don't shop online, you fool!
Put it away boys. Cover them up ladies. Your credit cards, we mean
Why your mum was WRONG about whiffy tattooed people
They're a future source of RENEWABLE ENERGY
Murder accused DIDN'T ask Siri 'how to hide my roommate'
US court hears of cached browser image - not actual request
Chomp that sausage: Brits just LOVE scoffing a Full Monty
Sales of traditional brekkie foods soar as hungry folk get their mitts greasy
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.