The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Is there a plan to DoS defacement sites off the Internet?

Stopping s'kiddies getting any publicity

  • print
  • alert

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Is there a co-ordinated attempt taking place to force defacement archives off the Internet?

After Safemode.org told us that a distributed denial of service attack against it had caused its ISP to drop it, the question needs to be asked.

The attack against Safemode.org, as described to us by its admin and co-founder Mystakill, occurred at the same time as attacks against Alldas.de, which also resulted in that site becoming unavailable. There are some subtle differences in the mode of attack though.

Mystakill told us that Safemode.org had become the victim of a "land" (or indirect) attack.

"The attackers send a DDoS spoofing our IP address as the source to many Web sites, he said. "The victims of the DDoS then respond to us or our ISP [BullsEyeTelco] about the problem.

"Our ISP or the up stream provider contacts us about our server being the aggressor of these attacks and demanded that the server be taken offline."

Most security related Web sites are subject to attack by s'kiddies but the suspicion is that Safemode.org and Alldas.de were targeted by people who (for whatever reason) wanted to see defacement archives taken off the Internet.

Defacement archives provide a valuable resource for the security community though they can be a difficult tenant for ISPs who have to cope with flames about port scanning, high bandwidth demands as well as the occasional DoS attack. It's also a hassle to those running the sites, which is one of the main reasons Attrition.org decided to drop its defacement archive earlier this year.

So, as it stands, both Safemode.org and Alldas.de are looking for an ISP to take them on. Neither is optimistic about getting back online anytime soon, if ever.

Who gains from this?

S'kiddies must be pleased their work is recorded on the Web for all to see, so we don't consider them as the likely perps. It makes far more sense that government and big business would prefer that these mirror sites "go away" so that the exploits of hackers are not exhibited or glorified.

Mystakill was quite willing to believe this theory.

"I would not put that past the US government," he said.

"We have hundreds of .gov and .mil sites mirrored, if you where a big security company or entire government would you want you blunders archived for all time?"

Quite. ®

Related Stories

DDos attack knocks out Alldas.de - for good?
Alldas defaced!
Alldas.de told to look for another home
Attrition abandons defacement mirrors
DNS mega-hack hits thousands of sites

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

More from The Register

 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
Speech-to-text drives motorists to distraction
Will talking to you mean I crash into that car up ahead, Siri?
DHS warns of vulns in hospital medical equipment
Has your doctor's anasthesia machine been hacked?
 breaking news
Yes, maybe we should keep hackers in the clink for YEARS, mulls EU
Watch out black hats, they just might throw away the key
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
Critical Java SE update due Tuesday fixes 40 flaws
And yes, most are remotely exploitable
NSA accused of new crimes ... against slideware
They may take our information but they cannot take our REFINED AESTHETICS