Feeds

3Com takes $19m hit on stuffed Euro inventories

An extra 1,000 staff get the bullet

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

3Com is canning 1,000 more staffers than it thought it would when it launched its restructuring plans last year. So its Q1 losses have quadrupled but the cost cutting is going well.

The total job cull is going to be 6,000 since November 2000, half of its workforce.

For the quarter ended 31 August 3Com said its loss widened to $132 million, excluding one off charges, from a pro forma loss of $41.3 million in the quarter a year earlier.

Including job cutting and other restructuring charges - like leaving the fledgling Internet appliance business and the consumer broadband-modem business, and taking a $19 million hit on European inventory problems - the loss was $232.4 million compared with $59.2 million a year earlier.

3Com Q1 sales fell to $390 million - they'd been $468 million in the previous quarter and $933.7 million in Q1 a year earlier.

Bruce Claflin, 3Com presidente and CEO, said: "3Com made solid progress during the first quarter of its fiscal year. It finished ahead of plan for expense reductions and cash. 3Com demonstrated meaningful margin improvement, and while revenue was below plan, there were some encouraging signs."

3COM's CommWorks, the unit that targets the telecom sector matched the previous quarter by generating $59.4 million dollars in revenue.

The Business Networks Company, which serves the enterprise market, generated $195 million of revenue. This missed internal targets but the stackable product line grew 18% sequentially, led by interest in recently announced Gigabit Ethernet products.

3Com's business connectivity company, which sells access products such as PC Cards and NICs to PC OEMs and enterprise customers, suffered because of reduced average selling prices, and inventory issues. In the past quarter 3Com reduced the unit's channel inventories by approximately $25 million, most of which was in Europe, and also took extraordinary charges of close to $19 million associated with the elimination of surplus inventories. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.