Feeds

BT rebranding dictated by Internet

Blimey, telco finally comes to senses

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

BT has finally demonstrated some grasp of Internet pre-planning with today's rebranding of its mobile group to mmO2 just before it floats it. The name will be reduced to just O2 for consumers.

Unlike last time it rebranded - just a few months ago - it has realised that it's best to register related domain names before telling the world what you plan to call yourself.

But - get this - not only did BT register the appropriate domains that it could get hold of, but it also registered confusingly similar domains and registered them under an employee's name rather than draw attention to itself by using the corporate name.

Even more incredibly, the entire corporate name may have been changed just to allow for the registering of domain names. How else can you explain the extra "m" at the front of the name? M for mobile, yes. But what the hell is the other "m" for? It certainly doesn't mention it in the press release it sent out first thing this morning.

Could it be that since all the main domains of mO2 and m02 have been registered, legitimately, for ages, that BT decided simply to add an "m" and then pick them up?

Quite possibly, especially since out of the eight domains of mmO2.com, co.uk, net and org and mm02.com, co.uk, net and org, BT has managed to register six of them, with one still available. Only www.mm02.com lies outside its grasp.

Of course, it hasn't had as much luck with the plain ole O2 and 02 domains. Of those eight, BT has one. That being www.O2.com - not bad, since it is the most important.

The domain www.02.com is up for sale and we have asked Online Sales.com how much it wants for it - we'll tell you when they get back. Domain www.mm02.com is owned by New Strategies and greets you with a big gif shouting "Cash in your hands" - which may well be true if BT is thinks it's worth coughing up for. ®

And so, well done BT. Not only have you finally worked out how the Internet works but you have even managed to think before you speak. You even changed the name of your company to fit in with the Internet.

Can we now look forward to another rebranding of Future BT so you can get some domains for that? ®

Related Story

Why BT is unbelievably Net stupid
BT Wireless changes its name to 'O2'

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.