Feeds

Big Biz spends Big Bucks on Win2000 upgrades

Other desktop costs slashed

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Cost-cutting is top of the agenda for the next quarter, according to the latest study of US CIOs by Morgan Stanley.

But it's not all doom and gloom. The majority of CIOs are continuing with their projects and most of them state that their budgets for new technology have yet to be slashed.

CIOs of US leading companies seem to be saying that they are keeping the purse strings pulled tight next quarter. Fifty four per cent of them said that they would not be spending more money on technology through the second half of the year than they did in the first. A further 61 per cent of the CIOs gave more bad news for the tech industry. Sixty three per cent said that they were actively looking to reduce the number of software vendors that they work with. That means more competition and that means more discounts - something the tech industry can ill afford.

However, the majority of those asked, 33 per cent, said that they had not reduced their budgets in light of the current economic conditions and the recent turmoil of the stock market. And only 15 per cent reported that they had cancelled networking projects. So it's not all bad.

And there's more good news - if only for Microsoft. Of all of the CIOs surveyed, 27.6 per cent said that they would be increasing their spending on Windows 2000 upgrades through the next half of the year.

It seems that most of the money being spent through the second half of 2001 will be going on Windows desktops and networks. Although 26 per cent of CIOs said that they would be spending on e-commerce initiatives, putting it at number three in the list of top spends, the rest of the top six were Windows desktop-related.

That's good news for Microsoft, but not exactly encouraging for the companies which have to maintain these services.

There is some confusion however. It may be true that Windows maintenance and upgrades seem to be getting the lion's share of cash spend over the next six months, but 56 per cent of CIOs say that cost is the main area where NT excels in their organisation. So perhaps they aren't spending much on the upgrades.

© IT-Analysis.com

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
Google+ goes TITSUP. But WHO knew? How long? Anyone ... Hello ...
Wobbly Gmail, Contacts, Calendar on the other hand ...
Preview redux: Microsoft ships new Windows 10 build with 7,000 changes
Latest bleeding-edge bits borrow Action Center from Windows Phone
Microsoft promises Windows 10 will mean two-factor auth for all
Sneak peek at security features Redmond's baking into new OS
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Google opens Inbox – email for people too stupid to use email
Print this article out and give it to someone techy if you get stuck
DEATH by PowerPoint: Microsoft warns of 0-day attack hidden in slides
Might put out patch in update, might chuck it out sooner
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.