Feeds

IIS worm made to packet Whitehouse.gov

As eEye Security descends into ambulance chasing

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Just when you thought you were finally safe from cyberwar with China, some dumb bastard has to go and create the 'Code Red' worm, targeting the White House Web site with distributed packet floods, and defacing IIS servers along the way with the inane motto "Hacked by Chinese!"

The worm attacks what's now called the .ida vulnerability, an unchecked buffer in the IIS Indexing Service ISAPI filter, which, if exploited, can yield system-level access to an intruder. The vulnerability was first reported by eEye Digital Security on 18 June; an attack script was released on 21 June by a Japanese fellow called HighSpeed Junkie; and the worm first appeared on 13 July.

After compromising a victim, the worm scans for other vulnerable IIS machines to infect. The scan is random, but the randomizing seed never changes, so the same IPs will get hit again and again from subsequently infected boxes. Bad news for sleepy admins; but good news overall, as this checks the worm's spread somewhat.

It would not be surprising to find that the author's IP is one of those repeatedly contacted. This would make it a no-brainer for him or her to keep track of newly-infected systems.

One of the more curious features of the worm is that some of the infected systems (we think those using other than US English versions of Win-NT, but the eEye bulletin is confusing) will periodically send 100k to port 80 at whitehouse.gov.

Chase that ambulance

One of the more curious features of the eEye bulletin is a surprisingly defensive commentary extolling the virtues of full disclosure. We're in favor of full disclosure too; but the tone here suggests real moral insecurity:

"An example of why full disclosure is so important would be this worm itself. Chances are this worm would have not been discovered if we had not fully disclosed details about the .ida vulnerability, allowing Intrusion Detection System vendors to create signatures for the .ida buffer overflow attack."

Of course, chances are the worm would never have been created, either, but that's a separate issue.

"The first instances of anyone learning anything useful about this worm was via Intrusion Detection Systems that had signatures based on our .ida vulnerability research which would not have been there if not for full disclosure. The computer underground continues to find vulnerabilities everyday. If full disclosure goes away, then the general security community is left in the dark, and therefore so are administrators," eEye warns.

And here comes the 'thank God for us' bit:

"More and more we are seeing an increase in worms attacking the Internet. There have been about 2 or 3 worms in as many months. Worms force computer security to become a global issue. With the rise of the Internet, not only do you have to worry about securing your own systems, you must also be careful of your neighbors' systems. For instance with this worm even if you have done everything right (installed the .ida patch etc...) your network connection could still be taken down because of the amount of data flooding you from all of the 'other guys' who hadn't applied patches and were infected by this worm. It is important to not only maintain your own security but make sure that other people you come in contact with secure their sites."

It reeks of ambulance chasing. It reeks of searching for vulnerabilities, and publicizing them, to sell security products. In other words, 'please recommend eEye's SecureIIS product to everyone you know so that you'll be safe.' The idiots who haven't yet bought it are ruining the Internet for everyone else.

In any event, the relevant IIS patches are available for Win-NT and 2K, except for W2K Datacenter Server, whose users need to pester their OEMs. The hole will be bunged in Win-XP before it's released, Microsoft says. ®

Related Links

The relevant MS security bulletin
The Win-NT 4.0 patch
The Win-2K Pro and Advanced Server patch

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Why has the web gone to hell? Market chaos and HUMAN NATURE
Tim Berners-Lee isn't happy, but we should be
Microsoft boots 1,500 dodgy apps from the Windows Store
DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! Naughty, misleading developers!
'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
And now a message from our sponsors: 'STFU or else'
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Linux turns 23 and Linus Torvalds celebrates as only he can
No, not with swearing, but by controlling the release cycle
Scratched PC-dispatch patch patched, hatched in batch rematch
Windows security update fixed after triggering blue screens (and screams) of death
This is how I set about making a fortune with my own startup
Would you leave your well-paid job to chase your dream?
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.