Feeds

Microsoft fails to renew its digital certificate

Hardly encourages e-commerce, does it?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Microsoft has forgotten to renew the digital certificate on one of its ecommerce sites.

secure.microsoft.co.uk allows developers to purchase pre-release software, but its Verisign-supplied digital certificate expired last Friday (June 22).

A secure connection can still be established with the site but by confronting visitors a warning notice about the certificate Microsoft will do little to encourage ecommerce. Without the signed certificate its users can't be certain that the site really belongs to Microsoft at all.

In March Microsoft had to admit that Verisign issued two certificates in its name to a scam artist posing as a Microsoft employee. The certificates were of the sort used to digitally sign programs and the group who obtained the certificates might use them to trick users into running malicious code, signing Trojan horses and viruses with Microsoft's name.

To address the problem, Microsoft announced plans to develop software that would make sure the bogus certificates are recognised as invalid.

After that experienced you'd think Microsoft had learned its lesson about managing digital certificates. Apparently not.

Microsoft isn't alone in having trouble keeping to date with the administration of its secure sites. Last month security specialist Symantec also forgot to renew the digital certificate on a site designed to act as a showcase for its products.

F-Secure, another security firm, also got its digital credentials in a twist shortly after because a digital certificate issued to validate one site was applied to verify another. Its possible to have group certificates that verify a family of sites but in the case of F-In-Secure didn't set up this properly.

Thanks to Davoud Davies for telling us about Microsoft certificate expiry. ®

External Links

Microsoft's expired certificate
Microsoft Internet Explorer server certificate validation vulnerability (the perils of crackers impersonating trusted sites)

Related Stories

Microsoft vexed by falsified certs
UK govt new encryption system only works with MS kit
F-In-Secure muddles up its digital certificate
Symantec forgets to renew its digital certificate

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Russian hackers exploit 'Sandworm' bug 'to spy on NATO, EU PCs'
Fix imminent from Microsoft for Vista, Server 2008, other stuff
FYI: OS X Yosemite's Spotlight tells Apple EVERYTHING you're looking for
It's on by default – didn't you read the small print?
Microsoft pulls another dodgy patch
Redmond makes a hash of hashing add-on
'LulzSec leader Aush0k' found to be naughty boy not worthy of jail
15 months home detention leaves egg on feds' faces as they grab for more power
Kill off SSL 3.0 NOW: HTTPS savaged by vicious POODLE
Pull it out ASAP, it is SWISS CHEESE
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.