Feeds

Q: How do you pass off a cancer-reducing mobile add-on?

A: Claim it's for increased phone efficiency

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

The controversy continues over reports that mobile phone manufacturers have patented cancer-reducing add-ons, when they claim there is no risk to humans from the phones.

Two days after The Times revealed the gadgets' existence, the phone companies have come up with their explanation. The "radiation-reducing devices" are not for reducing or redirecting waves that could cancer - why would that be the case when there's no risk? - no, they are for improving the phone's efficiency. This is a really good thing because it means batteries will last longer.

The "innovations" are for reducing the amount of radio waves that the phones emit, spokespeople from Ericsson and Motorola have said (haven't heard from Nokia yet), but the momentum behind their development is not to do with "health issues", it's for performance and efficiency.

This may seem like a particularly poor explanation, especially when they've had two days to think up an answer, but what other possibilities are there? If any readers have any better excuses email them to us and we'll forward them to the manufacturers.

This would be our explanation: that the shields are being developed to keep emissions from the next-generation of phones (which will have far greater power requirements) below the safe limits imposed by law. Limits that current mobile phones are well below.

Maybe we should go into PR.

The cancer issue - quite rightly - won't go away. For every study concluding that phones pose no risk, there is another saying they can cause brain tumours. It's a similar sort of situation as the argument over power lines and cancer/congential defects and nuclear power sites and leukaemia .

The government's official line at the moment is that young children should be wary with their usage. ®

Related Link

The Times article: Mobile firms patent cancer shields

Related Stories

Mobiles don't cause cancer! This time
Top US lawyer seeks mobile-phone cancer cash
We've got brain cancer and we want your money
US says cell phones won't kill you
My head hurts and I want $800 million
It's official: mobile phones give you diarrhoea

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
It may be ILLEGAL to run Heartbleed health checks – IT lawyer
Do the right thing, earn up to 10 years in clink
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.