Feeds

Q: How do you pass off a cancer-reducing mobile add-on?

A: Claim it's for increased phone efficiency

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Remote control for virtualized desktops

The controversy continues over reports that mobile phone manufacturers have patented cancer-reducing add-ons, when they claim there is no risk to humans from the phones.

Two days after The Times revealed the gadgets' existence, the phone companies have come up with their explanation. The "radiation-reducing devices" are not for reducing or redirecting waves that could cancer - why would that be the case when there's no risk? - no, they are for improving the phone's efficiency. This is a really good thing because it means batteries will last longer.

The "innovations" are for reducing the amount of radio waves that the phones emit, spokespeople from Ericsson and Motorola have said (haven't heard from Nokia yet), but the momentum behind their development is not to do with "health issues", it's for performance and efficiency.

This may seem like a particularly poor explanation, especially when they've had two days to think up an answer, but what other possibilities are there? If any readers have any better excuses email them to us and we'll forward them to the manufacturers.

This would be our explanation: that the shields are being developed to keep emissions from the next-generation of phones (which will have far greater power requirements) below the safe limits imposed by law. Limits that current mobile phones are well below.

Maybe we should go into PR.

The cancer issue - quite rightly - won't go away. For every study concluding that phones pose no risk, there is another saying they can cause brain tumours. It's a similar sort of situation as the argument over power lines and cancer/congential defects and nuclear power sites and leukaemia .

The government's official line at the moment is that young children should be wary with their usage. ®

Related Link

The Times article: Mobile firms patent cancer shields

Related Stories

Mobiles don't cause cancer! This time
Top US lawyer seeks mobile-phone cancer cash
We've got brain cancer and we want your money
US says cell phones won't kill you
My head hurts and I want $800 million
It's official: mobile phones give you diarrhoea

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
NSA mass spying reform KILLED by US Senators
Democrats needed just TWO more votes to keep alive bill reining in some surveillance
'Internet Freedom Panel' to keep web overlord ICANN out of Russian hands – new proposal
Come back with our internet! cries Republican drawing up bill
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Driving business with continuous operational intelligence
Introducing an innovative approach offered by ExtraHop for producing continuous operational intelligence.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?