Feeds

Political parties fail e-lectorate

Just paying lip service to the Net

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

All three main political parties have failed to address the needs of online voters, according to a survey by the Hansard Society.

The Society found that Labour, the Tories and LibDems failed to reply to emails sent in by voters. When they did reply, it took more than 13 hours for a response. Many were automated replies or referred voters to another source of information.

In one case a 25-page document was attached to an email.

The research shows that despite all the hype about 2001 being the year of the e-lection, Britain's political parties simply aren't geared up to use the interactivity of the Web.

While they're happy to issue propaganda via email or text message, they are incapable of meeting the needs of individual voters.

Of course, there's little surprise in this. The resources needed to handle all the enquiries would swamp even the most well resourced organisation.

Hopes that the Net would somehow herald a dimension in political accountability appear to be unfounded.

Dr Stephen Coleman, director of the Hansard Society's e-democracy programme, said: "The parties are offering lots of opportunities for the public to interact with them, but for the most part they are failing to provide the kind of authentic democratic interactivity that the Internet promises."

Anyhow, back to the research. The Hansard Society sent out the following nine questions via email to the three main parties:

1. How does your party feel about using the internet more often to involve the public in policy making?
2. Is it true that most MPs don't accept emails from their constituents? Would you accept - and reply to - them if elected?
3. Do you agree with me that Britain should join NAFTA?
4. Does your party support free eye tests for all?
5. I am unemployed and would like to know your party's policy on enabling people to open bank accounts who are currently rejected by the major banks?
6. What is your party's view on stem cell research?
7. Would you favour lowering the voting age to 16?
8. Who would you regard as the best Prime Minister of the 20th Century?
9. I am seven and when I grow up I want to become an MP. How do I learn to do this and which party should I support?

And here are the results.

Labour

  • Labour's average response time was 945.6 minutes (over 15 hours).
  • Labour responded to 89 per cent of the emails.
  • But 70 per cent of these were 'automated responses' that did not specifically answer the questions put - referring enquirers instead to the party manifesto or the Web site.
  • Only one response email from Labour contained information pertaining directly to the question asked - on the topic of free eye tests.

Conservatives

  • The Conservative response time was the fastest - with responses averaging at 771.6 minutes (about 13 hours).
  • The Conservatives were least likely to provide any response at all - replying to only 56 per cent of emails.
  • However, if enquirers were lucky enough to receive a response from the Conservatives it was in all cases related directly to the questions they asked.

Liberal Democrats

  • The Liberal Democrats' average response time at 1035.3 minutes (over 17 hours) was the longest of all the parties, but enquirers can expect to receive a personalised response.
  • The LibDems provided a response to 78 per cent of all email inquiries. The responses varied between one word on several occasions ('Yes' or 'No') and 10,000 words (a 25-page policy document was attached to one email) ®

Top three mobile application threats

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Record labels sue Pandora over vintage song royalties
Companies want payout on recordings made before 1972
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Number crunching suggests Yahoo! US is worth less than nothing
China and Japan holdings worth more than entire company
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
prev story

Whitepapers

SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.