Feeds

US airman charged in Korean hacking blitz. Maybe

More Airfix than Top Gun

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

A US Air Force airman has been charged with using his time in Korea to hack into a string of high profile web sites.

At least that's the story being carried by securitywatch.com, which reports the hapless 24 year-old has been charged with hacking 113 Korean web sites.

More Airfix than Top Gun, the first class airman, and premier league plonker, is said to have bragged about his exploit and even used his PC at Korea's Osan Air Base for hacking. The man, known only as 'R', was arrested by police at his girlfriend's house while allegedly in the act of hacking another web site.

The story falters here by stating R's portfolio of hacks included "35 Korea-based venture companies" (so where did the 113 figure come from?) but recovers by suggesting our eponymous anti-hero was a member of the whp defacement posse.

Records on defacement archives like Alldas.de do show a group called whp has been active in defacing Korean web sites of late. The whp crew has hit 22 web sites, all running Linux, in the last month and all the defacements seem to be in English.

Surprisingly for a story of this type it hasn't been picked up elsewhere. So is it true?

We tried e-mailing fearsome (fearsome@programmer.net) who's address appears on many defacers without any luck. We then considered phoning up the airbase to ask if it was missing an airman. Good sense prevailed on that one and we decided that wasn't a conversation we wanted to have straight after a long bank holiday weekend.

Stuck for any ideas about who we might talk to confirm the story we decided we'd run it anyway and let you decide whether it's true or not. It's one of those stories that so good it ought to be true, even if it isn't... ®

External Links

The whp crew's Korean hacking spree (what do they have against Linux anyway?)
Securitywatch.com: US airman nailed for cracking 113 Korean websites

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

More from The Register

next story
Spies would need SUPER POWERS to tap undersea cables
Why mess with armoured 10kV cables when land-based, and legal, snoop tools are easier?
Early result from Scots indyref vote? NAW, Jimmy - it's a SCAM
Anyone claiming to know before tomorrow is telling porkies
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
YouTube, Amazon and Yahoo! caught in malvertising mess
Cisco says 'Kyle and Stan' attack is spreading through compromised ad networks
Hackers pop Brazil newspaper to root home routers
Step One: try default passwords. Step Two: Repeat Step One until success
China hacked US Army transport orgs TWENTY TIMES in ONE YEAR
FBI et al knew of nine hacks - but didn't tell TRANSCOM
Microsoft to patch ASP.NET mess even if you don't
We know what's good for you, because we made the mess says Redmond
NORKS ban Wi-Fi and satellite internet at embassies
Crackdown on tardy diplomatic sysadmins providing accidental unfiltered internet access
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.