Feeds

WIN2K is even easier to deface than NT

MS claims give false sense of security

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The Power of One eBook: Top reasons to choose HP BladeSystem

Firms upgrading their computer systems to the Windows 2000 operating systems from NT 4 are exposing themselves to greater security risks from Web site defacement.

Records kept by security site Attrition.org indicate that an average of 55 per cent of Web site defacements so far this year are linked to exploitation of Windows NT operating systems vulnerabilities. Linux is the second most commonly hacked Web server and accounted for around 21 per cent of Web page defacement last month.

However buried within these figures is a trend of increased exploitation of sites running Windows 2000.

One in ten defaced Web sites in the Attrition archive run Windows 2000, which is racing ahead of the deployment of the technology. Prior to November 2000 less than 3 per cent of defacement were on Windows 2000 servers. The sharp increase since then is likely to be related to the release of exploits against Microsoft's IIS 5 Web server software.

This is having a real effect as s'kiddies are exploiting Windows 2000 vulnerabilities to claim an ever increasing number of high-profile victims including: The Walt Disney Company, The Wall Street Journal, BT, HSBC, The US Navy and The US Army.

Graeme Pinkney, of managed services security firm Activis, said that many firms had been "duped" into a false sense of security with Windows 2000 because of Microsoft's claims of enhanced security functionality with the operating system.

Pinkney said he wouldn't advise customers against using Windows 2000, which he said could be securely configured by people properly aware of latest security issues. This goes for any operating system but is all the more important for NT users, according to Activis.

"Building a secure site with Windows 2000 is like looking after a small child. It needs constant attention," said Pinkney, who added that regular vulnerability scanning and security audits are also a good idea for those administering Linux Web servers. ®

External links

Statistics on defacements from Attrition

Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications

More from The Register

next story
DARPA-derived secure microkernel goes open source tomorrow
Hacker-repelling, drone-protecting code will soon be yours to tweak as you see fit
How long is too long to wait for a security fix?
Synology finally patches OpenSSL bugs in Trevor's NAS
Roll out the welcome mat to hackers and crackers
Security chap pens guide to bug bounty programs that won't fail like Yahoo!'s
HIDDEN packet sniffer spy tech in MILLIONS of iPhones, iPads – expert
Don't panic though – Apple's backdoor is not wide open to all, guru tells us
Researcher sat on critical IE bugs for THREE YEARS
VUPEN waited for Pwn2Own cash while IE's sandbox leaked
Four fake Google haxbots hit YOUR WEBSITE every day
Goog the perfect ruse to slip into SEO orfice
Putin: Crack Tor for me and I'll make you a MILLIONAIRE
Russian Interior Ministry offers big pile o' roubles for busting pro-privacy browser
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Seven Steps to Software Security
Seven practical steps you can begin to take today to secure your applications and prevent the damages a successful cyber-attack can cause.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.