Feeds

TSMC fabs down to 50% capacity

Will it post a loss this quarter? Looks like it

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

TSMC's fabs are running at half capacity this quarter, company chairman Morris Chang has let slip in an interview with Forbes due to be published on 30 April.

As a measure of how tough business is in the chip industry, fab utilisation is a good barometer. If much more than half of a company's fab capacity is left idle, it's likely to start losing money, according to industry wisdom.

Chang doesn't appear to think the situation will get that bad, however. Q2 will mark the bottom of the trough the company finds itself in, he said in the interview, according to Taiwan's Commercial Times.

The recovery will come in the second half of the year, when it's estimated that the company will get up to - on average - 85 per cent of full capacity.

In the meantime, analysts expect TSMC to make a loss this quarter, CT reports. TSMC's Q1 sales were down 26.6 per cent on the previous quarter. During Q1 fab utilisation fell to 70 per cent of full capacity, so a further fall, to 50 per cent or below, is a sign sales are still sinking. Glug, glug, glug... ®

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.