Feeds

Spam is an occupational hazard

Email. Just say no

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

A third of emails received at work from colleagues are unnecessary, a report out today claims.

Between managing online porn, chain letters, gambling tips, flirting, jokes, praise, criticism, and emailers making free use of the "Reply All" function, workers spend an average of 49 minutes per day managing email.

And 24 per cent of the workforce devotes more than an hour a day on this task, according to a Gartner survey.

Those quizzed for the report added that only 27 per cent of email received needed their immediate attention.

"Employees are emailing their co-workers in higher frequencies in an effort to be helpful and more communicative," says Gartner senior analyst Maurene Caplan Grey. "In reality, they are cluttering email inboxes, filling up servers and sapping productivity with the volume of these messages.

"In a slowing economy, where businesses are looking for ways to cut costs and increase productivity, simply cutting out unnecessary e-mail will have an immediate impact."

Gartner reckons that by ditching this "occupational spam", workers would be able to cut down the time needed to manage email by a third.

Of course, they may also increase the amount of time spent chatting at the coffee machine or water cooler if their email lifelines are taken away.

Here are some Gartner tips for avoiding occupational spam (which you can email to all your co-workers later):


  • Think before hitting 'Reply All'

  • Don't forward jokes or non-business related email
  • Assume that agreement is implied. Don't get into a chain of needless responses such as: 'That sounds great,' 'OK, me too,' 'So that's a yes then,' 'Definitely,' 'Glad I could help,' etc, etc, ad infinitum.
  • Initiate the last reply and end messages with a phrase like 'FYI only - no reply needed'.

Meanwhile, the European Forum for Electronic Business (EEMA) has thoughtfully put together an

Email Best Practice Policy

, a list of sixteen do's and don'ts to ensure effective emailing. The document can be found

here

. ®

Related Links

Gartner release

Related Stories

'Cyberslackers' are curse of workplace
Employer snooping code: don't eavesdrop on staff

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
JINGS! Microsoft Bing called Scots indyref RIGHT!
Redmond sporran metrics get one in the ten ring
Driving with an Apple Watch could land you with a £100 FINE
Bad news for tech-addicted fanbois behind the wheel
Murdoch to Europe: Inflict MORE PAIN on Google, please
'Platform for piracy' must be punished, or it'll kill us in FIVE YEARS
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Sony says year's losses will be FOUR TIMES DEEPER than thought
Losses of more than $2 BILLION loom over troubled Japanese corp
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.