Feeds

MPs slam Oftel, BT, industry…

LLU is 'farcical'

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Oftel, BT and the telecoms industry have all been slammed for their handling of local loop unbundling (LLU) in Britain amid concerns that the whole process is in danger of becoming "farcical".

In a blunt report the Department of Trade and Industry Select Committee concluded that BT "dragged their feet" while other telcos couldn't agree "amongst themselves or with BT".

Oftel, the report said, "should have intervened earlier than they did, and made a better fist of the implementation once engaged in the process".

The report concludes: "The process of LLU to date has run less than smoothly. The blame for the delays and problems incurred to date must lie at the door of all participants in the process.

"Whilst the importance of LLU should not be overstated, it is an important delivery mechanism for broadband services. If the Government is to meet its objective of making the UK one of the world's leading knowledge economies, LLU must be successful," it said.

MPs had little time for the regulator explaining: "We understand that Oftel has had little hands-on experience of the practicalities of LLU and that some senior officers had not even visited an exchange. The episode has shown up some weaknesses in Oftel's grasp of the technical issues involved."

In a short statement Oftel welcomed report and said it will study the recommendations carefully.

"Local loop unbundling is a complex process and the report makes clear that the problems encountered need to be addressed by all participants.

"Oftel will continue to work closely with the industry to ensure that practical issues are resolved as quickly as possible so there are no obstacles to unbundling wherever there is demand for it," it said.

A spokeswoman for BT said the troubled telco also welcomed the report.

"It lays the blame at the feet of others," she said, "especially Oftel." ®

Related Links

Trade and Industry Report on Local Loop Unbundling

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Brit telcos warn Scots that voting Yes could lead to HEFTY bills
BT and Co: Independence vote likely to mean 'increased costs'
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
Blockbuster book lays out the first 20 years of the Smartphone Wars
Symbian's David Wood bares all. Not for the faint hearted
'Serious flaws in the Vertigan report' says broadband boffin
Report 'fails reality test' , is 'simply wrong' and offers ''convenient' justification for FTTN says Rod Tucker
This flashlight app requires: Your contacts list, identity, access to your camera...
Who us, dodgy? Vast majority of mobile apps fail privacy test
Apple Watch will CONQUER smartwatch world – analysts
After Applelocalypse, other wristputers will get stuck in
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.