Feeds

IR35 judicial review over

Just waiting for judge's decision

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

The judicial review into the IR35 tax measure at the High Court finished yesterday at around 7pm. The case itself has stretched two days longer than originally planned, taking up Monday and Tuesday this week. The judge has gone away to deliberate and will announce his decision on the legality of IR35 some time next week.

The case has been extensively covered in the press and on the Internet, not least by the group bringing the action against the government - the Professional Contractors Group.

As a whole, the five days have seen the judge, Mr Justice Burton, criticise the Inland Revenue and accept the arguments put forward by the PCG. Among the most notable issues the judge raised were that it seemed illogical to tax personal service company consultants as employees (IR35' essential intention) if they didn't receive employee benefits (causing concerns that billions of pounds would have to be paid out by UK companies) and that he wasn't persuaded that contractors other than those in the IT industry were affected.

Following the first three days, when the PCG stated its case, the judge arrived on Monday morning with a list of eight queries - which may be the deciding factors in the case. These were:


  1. Is the effect and intent of IR35 to eliminate the avoidance of tax and NICs?
  2. Will many workers with personal service companies (PSCs) be required to pay more to the Inland Revenue?
  3. Roughly 80% of PSCs are in the sectors referred to in the relief sought
  4. PSCs will experience uncertainty as a result of confusion as to what will and won't fall under IR35
  5. PSCs will be in competition with those larger companies which remain unaffected by IR35
  6. Those unaffected by IR35 have an advantage in tax flexibility and time
  7. IR35 will make some of those PSCs leave the country and will stop others wanting to set up in the country
  8. IR35 may have effects on interstate trade.

The QC acting for the Inland Revenue asked point three to be reduced to two-thirds. He only disagreed with points four and five, and attempted to argue his reasoning behind this. The Judge seemed unswayed.

And so it looks as though the PCG has won its case on the impracticability of IR35. This, however, is very different from finding the measure illegal and having it struck down. The decision over whether IR35 is legal will be based on seemingly obscure points of law. It is far from clear that the PCG has proved its case in this respect, and the judge will be naturally wary of striking any legislation passed by Parliament.

PCG spokeswoman Susie Hughes summed up the PCG's feeling: "We are very pleased that we have been allowed to put this case to the High Court. We are also pleased that the Judge has recognised our concerns and made several findings of fact in our favour. Now it is a question of points of law."

The case has certainly provided some plenty of copy. The group contesting the law, the PCG - has had a member taking extensive notes of the whole case and posting them on the Internet.

In fact, the case and the PCG in general has shown the great power of the Internet when it comes to allow people to communicate and share information. The judge even made mention of the Internet reports on the last day - suggesting that the Inland Revenue's QC check them to see what he had missed (he had had to leave at 4pm to catch a plane).

Related Link

For all the information you could possibly want on the case, go here.

Related Stories

IR35 protesters enter High Court
IR35 High Court date set

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
It may be ILLEGAL to run Heartbleed health checks – IT lawyer
Do the right thing, earn up to 10 years in clink
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.