Feeds

Canadian paper buys Napster in Sealand story

'We got our own Shawn Fanning'

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Young Canadian computer science student Matt Goyer claims to be preparing to set up a Napster clone with HavenCo, which operates out of the ludicrous principality of Sealand, to evade recording industry lawyers, according to a story in Monday's Globe and Mail.

Sounds like a killer solution: a Napster clone run offshore by a Shawn Fanning wannabe, but we wonder if the G&M hasn't run this story a bit prematurely. The scheme doesn't appear quite fully baked to us.

Regarding the fledgling's financial backing, we learn that Goyer "hopes to collect an estimated $15,000 yearly HavenCo rental fee from music fans. If that doesn't work out, he plans to sign up with other renegade services."

"There's enough irate people out there, I think I can get many to chip in $10 each," Goyer is quoted as saying.

So the whole thing depends on how much lunch money Goyer can get diverted to his bank account. It's not a news story, but a pipedream looking for an investor.

Still, the Globe and Mail publicity may have set the venture capital machine in motion. And if young Goyer should end up with the goods, we look forward to interviewing him then. ®

New hybrid storage solutions

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.