Feeds

MS XP previews morph into list building, market seeding

And we all get to pay the overheads...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Last week Microsoft announced a "Corporate Preview Program" for Office XP, giving "more than 500,000 corporate customers" the chance to check out pre-release code for the product over the next few (well, six actually) months. Today, a full seven days later, Microsoft released Office XP to manufacturing.

The CPP code is apparently based on Release Candidate 1 of XP, which itself was released around mid-February. At the time of the CPP announcement Microsoft clearly had CDs of the code ready to ship, as it was quoting three to five days for express delivery. It might even have had 500,000 (although we recall that being the MS-quoted magic number for he Win2k CPP as well)... but, why?

Do the numbers. Say Microsoft had two weeks from getting to RC1 to arrange enough volume CD pressings to be able to kick off the CPP on February 28th. So if it RTMs Office XP on March 5th (which it did), it could actually CPP the gold code and (we'll throw in another week because we're generous) announce this on March 26th. Basing the exercise on gold code when you're already going into manufacture of the full retail product wouldn't necessarily be a completely worthless exercise, because it's obviously a darn sight quicker to just run off the CDs than to put together the manuals, documentation, licensing and support packages. People who wanted to see Office XP a couple of months early would still get the chance.

And it's a tempting offer. It costs $19.95 a pop, that pop being not a single user product, but a kit that can be installed on up to ten computers. And you can order up to five kits, so you could roll it out to a reasonable sized office. You're able to use it up until August 31st, after which it reverts to "reduced-functionality mode," which means you can look at the files you made, but you can't touch until you buy an XP licence.

Despite the "corporate" tag, Microsoft merchandising seems decidely unchoosy about the target customers. So long as you fill in name, address, company, job spec etc and a credit card number, it would appear to be cool. So what have we got?

It's clearly another increment in the evolution of Microsoft beta code away from actual testing and towards product seeding and list building. First Microsoft went with widespread, public "betas" which had no influence on the final product (because they were pretty much final product). Then it hit on the wheeze of levying some kind of "handling" charge for the preview code, so this component of pre-launch marketing could be largely self-financing. And now it's shipping a preview just days before the product RTMs, making even the fiction of user input impossible to maintain.

Tsk. What can you do with them? And we can't help noting a couple of other points. Sure, the XP CPP code will be time-bombed, and it'll no doubt also be subject to Product Activation, as will the final shipping code. But time bombs get cracked, and so may Product Activation (the jury's still out on that one) - so is the benefit for Microsoft of getting the code out there worth the risks associated with showering the world with cheap CDs?

But then again, Microsoft will have a lot more information about the CPP participants than it will necessarily have about purchasers of the full product. You won't, we're assured, be compelled to register Office XP, and you won't have to give out any personal details when you go through the activation process. That's clearly not the case with the CPP, because although you might not fill in the right details, you're going to have to fill in a credit card of sorts, and an address of sorts - right?

Look for even more tempting database-building cheapies from Redmond RSN - we can't wait for the WinXP cover-mounts... ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
Return of the Jedi – Apache reclaims web server crown
.london, .hamburg and .公司 - that's .com in Chinese - storm the web server charts
Chrome 38's new HTML tag support makes fatties FIT and SKINNIER
First browser to protect networks' bandwith using official spec
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.