Feeds

Cyber Patrol bans The Register

Shurely shome mishtake Surfcontrol

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

We are officially irresponsible. Surfcontrol, the Internet filtering company, has, for some reason, put us on its CyberNOT list - which means that those using CyberPatrol won't be able to see us (or even this story).

Don't believe us? Look here.

We have a few questions. The first would have to be: why? We write about IT, for chrissakes. We are the very people that tell everyone what is going right/wrong with the Internet. It seems somewhat perverse that we are therefore blocked.

Is this a conspiracy? Surely not. In fact, Surfcontrol's PR man seemed somewhat concerned when we called up to ask him if the company was really doing its job properly. Not that he's got back yet.

Another question. Is it appropriate that Surfcontrol should have - and exercise - the right to block from its customers publications which may write about...Surfcontrol.

If we were to point out, for example, that, in contradiction to what Surfcontrol said this morning, filtering software has not been as successful as everyone expected and the company looks ripe for a takeover and strip down - would it be able to simply cut us off?

Yes, it would. And despite the fact that it is proud of its openness and that you can request for a site to be re-reviewed, we couldn't find a direct telephone number for this service and our query regarding banned status found only an automated response.

We were alerted to Surfcontrol's action in placing The Register on its CyberNOT list by an employee of Citrix, bemoaning his inability to look at our site anymore.

By coincidence Citrix pays its PR company pots of money to get stories into, among others, The Reg. What if we were to offer Citrix, instead, a thin-client channel, complete with free sponsorship for a year. In return all we ask for is that it ditches Surfcontrol.

Unprofessional, huh? But nothing like as sinister as Surfcontrol blocking our site from view from its customers.

Explain yourself, Surfcontrol. And take us off your list. There: we asked nicely. Next time, tomorrow, we shall be much more forceful. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.