Feeds

VeriSign joins multilingual domain name party

The World Wide Web starts living up to its name

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

VeriSign has joined the growing movement for foreign-language domain names. Existing customers will be allowed to register .coms, .nets and .orgs in French, German, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian and Swedish (and another 56 languages).

The company will use the registrations to test its encoding system for foreign characters. The sites, it reckons, will then go live two to three months later.

VeriSign isn't the first to offer people domain names in their own language (i-DNS.net was there a long time ago). It is, however, the first well-known Western registrar that has made a point of offering multilingual domains. The ability to register domains in anything but English ASCII text only started in November.

Asian domain names, of course, have been doing great trade for some time. Mostly, it must be said, because languages like Chinese and Japanese are represented by a different alphabet. But with the huge expansion of the Net, it is growing away from the US and English-dominated situation. People want to read Web sites in their own language (fair enough) but despite only 5 per cent of the world having English as a first language, about three-quarters of all Web sites are written in English.

We think they're all wrong because having everything in English makes our lives 100 times easier, but if you must, you must.

Actually, registering multilingual domain names is rapidly becoming a big topic and threatens to open up the congested global top-level domain system all over again. Those registrars that get in early - if they can handle the demand - are onto a winner.

If you're interested in knowing more, check out what Patrick O'Brien (VP of i-DNS.net) had to say about it all at the WIPO conference in Geneva recently. It's in an Acrobat format (pdf) and you can download it by clicking here. Meanwhile, we're gonna have to get round to registering www.leregistre.com, www.elregistro.com and dieregister.com. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.