Feeds

NSA chief says bin Laden has superior technology

Trust no one

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Islamic terrorist Osama bin Laden has superior technology at his disposal than the National Security Agency, the head of the super-secretive spy agency has told an American documentary programme.

Superior technological capabilities helped bin Laden to mastermind the simultaneous 1998 bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people, said General Mike Hayden, head of the NSA, during an interview to be broadcast tonight on CBS' 60 Minutes II news show.

"Osama bin Laden has at his disposal the wealth of a $3-trillion-a-year telecommunications industry that he can rely on," Hayden will say in the interview, according to newswire reports. "We are behind the curve in keeping up with the global telecommunications revolution."

There's more in the interview about the NSA's use of legacy technology and the confirmation of a widely-rumoured technology failure early last year, but all this misses the main point.

The idea that the signals intelligence arm of the US (the world's richest country) is behind in innovation involving the latest technology compared to an international pariah living in Afghanistan (one of the world's poorest states) beggars belief.

Isn't this the same agency that always touting its advanced in supercomputers and cryptographic research? Isn't this the NSA that has the sympathetic ear of Congress for its funding requests? Isn't this the super-secretive agency that has for years being using secret alien technology and abducting American citizens, like Scully from the X-files?

OK - the last one is fiction, but so are the protestations by Hayden (who might enjoy a successful career as a deadpan comic). The argument of a technology gap between the NSA and bin Laden has everything to do with the start of a New York trial of suspects in the bombing of the US embassies and an attempt by the NSA to coax further funding from Congress by inflating the cyber-terrorism menace.

It might also be an attempt by the NSA to persuade the IT industry to help keep its systems up to date, which if it pulls it off, will rank as one of the greatest acts of subterfuge in the agency history. You've got to admire its cheek though. ®

Related stories:
US Congress whips up 'cyber menace' again
Militants plan terror in chat rooms shocker
Hackers are terrorists, says UK law

External links:
NSA Chief Says Bin Laden's Technology Is Superior

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
FYI: OS X Yosemite's Spotlight tells Apple EVERYTHING you're looking for
It's on by default – didn't you read the small print?
Microsoft pulls another dodgy patch
Redmond makes a hash of hashing add-on
NOT OK GOOGLE: Android images can conceal code
It's been fixed, but hordes won't have applied the upgrade
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
DEATH by PowerPoint: Microsoft warns of 0-day attack hidden in slides
Might put out patch in update, might chuck it out sooner
'LulzSec leader Aush0k' found to be naughty boy not worthy of jail
15 months home detention leaves egg on feds' faces as they grab for more power
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.