Microsoft to support AMD's Sledgehammer?

Definitely... maybe...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Two tantalising hints have emerged suggesting that Microsoft really does plan to support AMD's upcoming Hammer family of 64-bit processors.

Both clues come from third-party postings on a couple of investor-oriented bulletin boards. The first is said to be a copy of an email from Microsoft itself, posted on Silicon Investor. Asked by a punter whether the company will support AMD's x86-64 architecture via the Sledgehammer chip, the Beast's spokesimp apparently replied: "Yes we are always working with AMD to make our OS compatible."

Not a direct affirmative, perhaps, but probably the closest Microsoft will come to one.

The second posting, this time over at Motley Fool, says: "Last week I met with a friend who works for MSFT who I have been discussing AMD with and who was also at a presentation given by Bill G last week.

"Apparently Bill G talked about the forthcoming 64-bit processors saying that AMD had a simple and (32-bit) compatible approach to 64-bit while Intel's Itanium had a completely new architecture that would need software to be re-written for it. Bill ended the subject by saying that MSFT will be supporting both processors."

All of which is interesting given comments made by a senior Microsoft staffer at a European developers conference last autumn. Asked if the next generation of Windows 2000 - codenamed Whistler, but now known as Windows XP - wouldn't be released earlier in order to cater for the release of AMD's Sledgehammer, the speaker said: "No, because we have no intention of supporting the Sledgehammer with Whistler."

XP is due this summer. Apparently, the Microsoftie's stark response was shortly afterward modified from "never" to "later", which, since AMD's current roadmap has Sledgehammer shipping early 2002, makes sense. Of course, since x86-64 appears to offer better backward compatibility with 32-bit apps than Itanium - ie. better support for apps Microsoft sells and will continue to sell - Microsoft would be daft to ignore the platform. Microsoft may be many things, but stupid isn't one of them.

Of course, both postings could be false - either the posters are pulling a fast one, or their sources - and there's no third-party confirmation, but both do suggest movement from Microsoft's previous position of saying either nothing or 'no'. ®

Related Links

The Motley Fool posting
The Silicon Investor posting

Related Stories

Transmeta helping out AMD, MS with Sledgehammer coding?
MS drags feet on AMD Sledgehammer support


Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The Heartbleed Bug: how to protect your business with Symantec
What happens when the next Heartbleed (or worse) comes along, and what can you do to weather another chapter in an all-too-familiar string of debilitating attacks?