Feeds

Readers Letters My Google Usenet – wrong or right?

Blindsided Reg readers strike back

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Google - what's there not to like?

Until about lunchtime on Monday, very little. While general relief was expressed at the start-up's acquisition of Deja's Usenet archive, our readers were amazed to discover that they couldn't use the familiar Deja interface. Google had hurriedly knocked up a front-end, CEO Larry Page explained this week, but for many of you that meant a valuable service had been scuppered.

Not all of you are critical of Google - the company evidently has much good will from the community, but many of you are angry. Really angry. Here's a representative sample:-

Simon Birkby summed the sentiment up best with this letter:-


I've lost count of the number of times I've found inspiration, education or the answer to some challenge, in the Deja.com (nee DejaNews) archive. I'd say it's worth as a resource is probably incalculable. The ability to employ technology to deliver a usable way to 'shoot the breeze' with the rest of planet is, for me, how the Internet pays for itself in human terms. Websites are just a useful adjunct.

You hit the nail on the head - it truly felt like being blinded in some way when it went. I hope we all get it back soon

And specifically, Deja's clunky but very precise search tools, could get a specific job done, as MH explains:-

Please count me among the countless people that realize the real power and priceless asset Deja.com's search engine has provided.

Sure, you could find everything from torrid, smutty stories to age-old posts amid it's archive, but the REAL treasure lies in the exchange of TECHNICAL solutions to problem that crop up.

Where else can you go to type and file name (ie..winsock.dll) and combine it with a symptom (page fault) and find a msg. from some nameless IT guy in Mozambique? That same msg often has replies from people that have encountered the same issue, and have a fix/work around for it.

It's simply amazing!

I train a number of techies, and I ALWAYS have introduced them to Deja.com as such a tool -- an answerbook written by the very souls who encounter the same hair-extracting frustration at dealing with software incompatibilites, glitches and plain poor programming...

Many, many thanks for bringing this news to light...and encouraging a subtle backlash on those (dare I say Google..?) that fail to recognize what they hold in their proverbial hands.

Is a user rebellion likely? Nigel Hunter thinks so:

I have to confess that I'm gutted about the loss of this previously awesome newsgroup search engine. People should campaign to have the original u/i restored or we should vote with our feet.

Similarly, Steve writes:

You would not believe how utterly fucking pissed-off I am right now about this whole cock-up of a mess. Anyone interested in starting a class-action lawsuit
against Google?

Woah, there. Google is private company Steve, and we don't think there's a law that criminalizes badly designed web UIs. (Jakob's probably got a draft ready, but we digress)

Not all of you were convinced by Google boss Larry Page's summary on Wednesday, two days into the new beta Google service. Andy Turner writes:-

I can't believe that Larry Page said "Most are happy," he said, as traffic had remained constant from Deja levels, or even increased slightly.

What? Of course traffic has increased - because no-one can fecking find anything anymore, they have to hit it three times as much just to find what they wanted!!!! Sheesh.

Which makes us hope that when Google revises its beta, it won't make the same speed/content calculations that made its web search engine so successful. Mark Whitaker points out he'd rather it took a little longer, provided it gave useful returns:-

"It now takes 10 searches where 1 would do previously to find the same information! But then, "Speed was the primary thing" of course. (I'm using an ageing 56K modem and Deja was always fast enough for me.) Give me 1 slow page rather than 10 fast ones any day."

Dissenters there were, too:-

I must admit - for a targeted search, I've just played with the new interface, and find it a lot easier than the old deja setup. writes Anthony Youngman.

And a number of you think that all web UIs onto Usenet will be second best to a decent Newsreader client:-

Your objection seems to be that this interface isn't good for browsing. Well, it *should* not be. NNTP is a very efficient method of distributing the load of Usenet across the network ... people who are browsing should be browsing from their local news server.

Google have made exactly the right choices, and have returned us after many years to a Usenet search engine which actually works well. Congratulations (once again), Google. writes Simon Brooke.

Local news servers? Weren't they phased out with the end of rationing? A good point, but judging from all of your feedback, most of you don't have ISPs that provide a news feed, so it's Deja or the highway...

On balance, it was running at about 5:1 in favour of restoring the old Deja interface, and that ratio has probably doubled as the week's gone on. Many of you express hope that you'll get a Deja-like interface again, only with added Google speed. That would mean Google junked its web ranking metrics, but as the co-creator Usenet Steve Bellovin pointed out, they require different approaches.

Human conversations tend to be interesting because they stray, and Google's web search is successful because it filters out this digression and irrelevance.

Finally no US letter section is complete without the token Comedy Libertarian. This time Shawn Maheney objected to the idea we floated that Usenet should be maintained as a distributed system among the Universities, with some seed money from the Government:-

Next time you have a forced blackout due to a power shortage, think again about how much you want the gubment deciding how things get done. he writes.

Too right, Shawn: give those crazy University researchers some gubment money, and who knows what they might come up with ... like The Internet. Or Usenet. Or even this ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Facebook's Zuckerberg in EBOLA VIRUS FIGHT: Billionaire battles bug
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contacted as site supremo coughs up
Boffins who stare at goats: I do believe they’re SHRINKING
Alpine chamois being squashed by global warming
Space exploration is just so lame. NEW APPS are mankind's future
We feel obliged to point out the headline statement is total, utter cobblers
Down-under record: Australian gets $140k for pussy
'Tiffany' closes deal - 'it's more common to offer your wife', says agent
Internet finally ready to replace answering machine cassette tape
It's a simple message and I'm leaving out the whistles and bells
FedEx helps deliver THOUSANDS of spam messages DIRECT to its Blighty customers
Don't worry Wilson, I'll do all the paddling. You just hang on
The iPAD launch BEFORE it happened: SPECULATIVE GUFF ahead of actual event
Nerve-shattering run-up to the pre-planned known event
Win a year’s supply of chocolate (no tech knowledge required)
Over £200 worth of the good stuff up for grabs
STONER SHEEP get the MUNCHIES after feasting on £4k worth of cannabis plants
Baaaaaa! Fanny's Farm's woolly flock is high, maaaaaan
Adorkable overshare of words like photobomb in this year's dictionaries
And hipsters are finally defined as self-loathing. Sort of
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.