Feeds

Woundup IM merger looms, Windows nametag inflation

There'll be just the one. Except for...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

It's about time someone stepped in and tried to create a standard protocol for all the instant messaging services. IMUnified is currently teaming up with AT&T, Excite@Home, Odigo and Prodigy Communications, along with Microsoft and Yahoo - both of whom have well-known IM software. AOL Time Warner is still debating whether or not to join the pool with AIM; it claims there are issues with security and privacy.

I personally don't mind having ICQ, AIM, and MSN Messenger open at the same time. They aren't right in front of me, I have all sounds off to keep away all the ignoring "yoo-hoo's", and I only use them whenever I actually need them. Also, all these three applications have different features, and to even think about implementing them all into one sounds like a big bloated piece of software.

ZDNET has an article concerning the new addition of Windows XP into the Windows family, and the confusion the name will cause. There's a lot to keep up with, you have Windows 9x, Windows Me, Windows 2000, companies who still use Windows NT, and now Windows XP. We can forget about Windows 95, it's definitely time to upgrade to Windows 98. But you have to keep Windows 98 because not many are going to want to upgrade to something less, like Windows Me. Finally, Windows 2000 is more for the power/business user, making it a not so good choice for a home user.

What Windows XP will do is provide two versions, similar to the current Windows 98 (Windows XP Personal) and Windows 2000 (Windows XP Professional), which will tie all the Windows into one, making the rest obsolete - excluding Windows 2000, which people will still use for a while, just as people are still using NT4. Will this happen? It all depends on Microsoft. If they can create a piece of software as strong and reliable as both Windows 98 and Windows 2000, then they have a winner, but if they create a useless update like Windows Me, then they're not going to get anywhere until Blackcomb (Windows 2002) comes out.

Any tips, queries? Send them to Luis at The Register. ®

This week's Windows Roundups

Win2k server - 1m sales and still going, er, slow
Brace yourself for the new Windows XP UI
XPerience triumphs over hope

All our Windows roundups are archived here

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
Return of the Jedi – Apache reclaims web server crown
.london, .hamburg and .公司 - that's .com in Chinese - storm the web server charts
Chrome 38's new HTML tag support makes fatties FIT and SKINNIER
First browser to protect networks' bandwith using official spec
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.