Feeds

Verizon hit with another DSL lawsuit

Big Apple lawyers limber up

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Verizon faces another class-action lawsuit in the US over its DSL service.

This time the case is being brought by New York law firm Stamell & Schager, who claim the monster telco is fair game due to allegedly misleading punters through its marketing of the high-speed Net service.

The motion was originally filed on behalf of Verizon users in Washington, Maryland, New Jersey and New York, and is now on the cards to be a nationwide class-action lawsuit - lawyers will argue for the move next month.

If they get the go-ahead, they will represent all 540,000 Verizon DSL customers (unless any opt-out). Otherwise, they plan pursue the case for individuals, according to Jason L Solotaroff, a lawyer at Stamell & Schager.

Their main claim is that Verizon marketed DSL aggressively, giving the impression that the company could handle the service. Solotaroff claims it cannot, saying the service is still basically at the beta stage - but that prospective customers would never get this information from Verizon's adverts or promotions.

He may also push for an injunction to stop Verizon advertising the service.

Another claim involves the speed of the service. Verizon has admitted that the advertised 640K package is actually the maximum speed that users can get, Solotaroff said. He described this as "not meaningful", after all, whoever complained about their Internet service being too fast?

New Yorkers have already threatened Verizon with legal eagles and won. Last year the telco paid $1.75 million compensation to end an enquiry into the city's residents' long-distance services mysteriously switching to Verizon.

But Solotaroff may have to get in line to have a pop at Verizon. Washington lawyers Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll have also filed a class-action suit against the company in DC Superior Court, using pretty similar arguments. Solotaroff says his original suit pre-dates theirs by around a year - "they're too late, we're not worried," he confided to The Reg. ®

Related Stories

Verizon sued for crap DSL service
Verizon tells New York to quit DSL whingeing
Verizon moves to appease Silicon Alley Net anger
New Yorkers plot DSL protest
Long distance compensation get me Verizon on the phone

New hybrid storage solutions

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Forget silly privacy worries - help biometrics firms make MILLIONS
Beancounter reckons dabs-scanning tech is the next big moneypit
Microsoft's Office Delve wants work to be more like being on Facebook
Office Graph, social features for Office 365 going public
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.