Feeds

Congress sets date for ICANN review

ICANN should expect a hard time

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

The US House Committee On Energy and Commerce has released its schedule of events and its much-heralded review of ICANN's global top level domain selection. It will take place this Thursday in Washington, starting at 10am.

Chairman of the committee, Billy Tauzin, sent the top man at ICANN, Mike Roberts, a letter on 12 January, informing him that his committee would be continuing its review into the domain name system and was preparing a hearing for February. The letter clearly spells out that it is concerned over complaints that ICANN's system for deciding new global TLDs was flawed and inhibited competition.

The final selection of .aero, .coop, .info, .museum, .name, .pro, and .biz, and the dropping of more popular domain names, especially .web, has been seen by many as the epitome of ICANN's arrogance and corruptibility. Those who wanted their TLD bids considered had to pay $50,000 each. When some excellent bids were dismissed out of hand and over domains awarded to companies that heavily sponsor ICANN, many asked for the process to be reviewed. The Committee is expected to give ICANN a hard time over it.

The current schedule lists as follows: "Thursday, February 8, 2001.10:00 am in 2123 of the Rayburn House Office Building. The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications. The hearing, entitled 'Is ICANN's New Generation of Internet Domain Name Selection Process Thwarting Competition?' will focus on ICANN's recently announced selections of registry operators for new top level domains."

Fortunately, the Committee Webcasts all its meetings on Real Player. The only trouble is that this will be a popular event, so if you do manage to get on, quality is likely to be poor. Should prove interesting.

Check out the links below for more. ®

Related Links

Main Committee site
Current schedule
Letter to ICANN

Related Stories

ICANN: one in, four out, more TLD controversy
ICANN legal pay-off avoids scrutiny
Country code chiefs, registrars mull ICANN breakaway
ICANN speaks: lucky seven TLDs include .pro and .biz

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Big Content outs piracy hotbeds: São Paulo, Beijing ... TORONTO?
MPAA calls Canadians a bunch of bootlegging movie thieves
Google Glassholes are UNDATEABLE – HP exec
You need an emotional connection, says touchy-feely MD... We can do that
Lawyers mobilise angry mob against Apple over alleged 2011 Macbook Pro crapness
We suffered 'random bouts of graphical distortion' - fanbois
Just don't blame Bono! Apple iTunes music sales PLUMMET
Cupertino revenue hit by cheapo downloads, says report
US court SHUTS DOWN 'scammers posing as Microsoft, Facebook support staff'
Netizens allegedly duped into paying for bogus tech advice
Feds seek potential 'second Snowden' gov doc leaker – report
Hang on, Ed wasn't here when we compiled THIS document
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.