Feeds

Intel to hijack world with InfiniBust – analyst

Rambus redux?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

The minions of the Satan Clara chip factory may be busy at work weaving a fabric to ensnare the entire computing and networking industries, but according to a leading industry analyst, this fabric has a few Rambus-sized holes in it.

InQuest Market Research reckons InfiniBand - for which silicon and software began sampling this week - remains more hype than technology. InfiniBand is a design Chipzilla is pushing to eventually displace PCI/PCI-X, LDT, Rapid I/O, Fibre Channel and even Ethernet. Trouble is, InfiniBand doesn't seem to offer anything over any of the established standards.

"There is an indisputable need in the market for PCI-X," says the report. "It is required as soon as possible to satisfy (in a compatible manner) platform bandwidth requirements that are upon us in the present and immediate future.

"By contrast, InfiniBand is one of several options for the future. It may supersede and obsolete all other present and future I/O technologies as Intel seems to suggest, but there is reason for doubt. As a replacement for PCI-X, the arguments for InfiniBand come up short. As a replacement for Ethernet and Fibre Channel, we also have trouble seeing an unobstructed entry point for InfiniBand."

The InQuest analyst responsible for this glowing Infiniband report is Bert McComas who remains one of the industry's most vocal critics of this controversial memory design.

And McComas doesn't let the "Internet Building Blocking" wannabe forget its expensive Lawsuitzilla mistakes.

"Like an amphibious vehicle that can function on both land and water, but makes neither a good car nor a good boat, InfiniBand tries to portray itself as a jack-of-all-trades, yet finds itself lacking or unproven in many areas. We do not get the impression that Intel is unaware of this (they created it). Nor do we get the impression that Intel is going to let up simply because the market begins to call their bluff.

"The RDRAM fiasco has proven that Intel knows how to take its own medicine when its strategies come back to bite them. InfiniBand could turn out to be an instant smash hit. Or it could turn out to be another test of Intel's intestinal fortitude." ®

Related Link

You can read the InQuest report here

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.