Feeds

Intel to hijack world with InfiniBust – analyst

Rambus redux?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

The minions of the Satan Clara chip factory may be busy at work weaving a fabric to ensnare the entire computing and networking industries, but according to a leading industry analyst, this fabric has a few Rambus-sized holes in it.

InQuest Market Research reckons InfiniBand - for which silicon and software began sampling this week - remains more hype than technology. InfiniBand is a design Chipzilla is pushing to eventually displace PCI/PCI-X, LDT, Rapid I/O, Fibre Channel and even Ethernet. Trouble is, InfiniBand doesn't seem to offer anything over any of the established standards.

"There is an indisputable need in the market for PCI-X," says the report. "It is required as soon as possible to satisfy (in a compatible manner) platform bandwidth requirements that are upon us in the present and immediate future.

"By contrast, InfiniBand is one of several options for the future. It may supersede and obsolete all other present and future I/O technologies as Intel seems to suggest, but there is reason for doubt. As a replacement for PCI-X, the arguments for InfiniBand come up short. As a replacement for Ethernet and Fibre Channel, we also have trouble seeing an unobstructed entry point for InfiniBand."

The InQuest analyst responsible for this glowing Infiniband report is Bert McComas who remains one of the industry's most vocal critics of this controversial memory design.

And McComas doesn't let the "Internet Building Blocking" wannabe forget its expensive Lawsuitzilla mistakes.

"Like an amphibious vehicle that can function on both land and water, but makes neither a good car nor a good boat, InfiniBand tries to portray itself as a jack-of-all-trades, yet finds itself lacking or unproven in many areas. We do not get the impression that Intel is unaware of this (they created it). Nor do we get the impression that Intel is going to let up simply because the market begins to call their bluff.

"The RDRAM fiasco has proven that Intel knows how to take its own medicine when its strategies come back to bite them. InfiniBand could turn out to be an instant smash hit. Or it could turn out to be another test of Intel's intestinal fortitude." ®

Related Link

You can read the InQuest report here

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.