Feeds

Warner Brothers shoots at more innocents

Harry Potter domains - expect lawyers on your case

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Warner Brothers' intimidation of the owners of Harry Potter-named Web sites continues. Not only is the harrypotterguide.co.uk situation still going on but several other owners have been in touch to relay their anger over how they've been treated.

We've been talking to Claire Field's dad, Les (she owns the www.harrypotterguide.co.uk domain), and he tells us he's sick with worry over Warner Brothers legal bullying of his daughter's Web site. As Les says, he doesn't have the money to work through the legal system. But then he's equally furious at the treatment dished out by the multinational conglomerate.

We decided to do a bit of research into Harry Potter domain names as a whole and were appalled at what we saw. It would appear that since Warner Brothers gained the rights to the Harry Potter movie, it has embarked on a policy of intimidation against anyone that has the effrontery to register a domain name including the words Harry Potter.

Worse than that, Warner Brothers hasn't had the commonsense to register Harry Potter-related sites - which would cost far less than one lawyer's letter each. For example, the owner of www.harrypotterisawizard.co.uk has been forced to hand over his URL but EVERY OTHER domain, including .com, .net, .org etc etc etc is still available. What about www.harrypotterwizard? All available - every TLD.

We can't decide whether it's maliciousness or just plain stupidity that have stopped the multi-billion pound company from picking up these domains. Either way, we're not impressed. If WB wants to escape a charge of bullying then perhaps it shouldn't blatantly bully people. ®

Related Stories

Another child's Christmas ruined by Warner Brothers
Warner Bros/ Harry Potter dispute kicks off again
Warner Bros backs down on Harry Potter Web site
Reg to fight for Harry Potter 'cybersquatter'
Warner Brothers bullies girl over Harry Potter site

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Hey, Scots. Microsoft's Bing thinks you'll vote NO to independence
World's top Google-finding website calls it for the UK
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
OECD lashes out at tax avoiding globocorps' location-flipping antics
You hear that, Amazon, Google, Microsoft et al?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.