Feeds

WAP is CWAP – Jakob Nielsen

Usability guru joins WAPlash

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

A report published today recommends that companies looking to offer mobile Internet services should delay their entry into the marketplace until the technology improves.

The report claims the true potential for the mobile Internet isn't expected to gain momentum until 2003.

It argues that users are turned off by the WAP experience and that it simply does not live up to their expectations - regardless of the hype peddled by telcos.

The study adds further weight to the growing number of users who've tried the technology but conclude that WAP is CWAP.

Twenty people in London were asked to test the user-friendliness of the technology. After being handed the blessed things and told to use them for a week, 70 per cent of people said they would not consider getting a WAP phone within the next year. Only 20 per cent said they would like to get one within the next three years.

Those who tested WAP said that even the simplest tasks took too much time to be of any real use. The performance of WAP was described as "appallingly low".

"In my opinion, WAP stands for Wrong Approach to Portability," said Jakob Nielsen of the Silicon Valley-based user-experience think tank and consulting firm, Nielsen Norman Group.

"Companies shouldn't waste money fielding WAP services that nobody will use while WAP usability remains so poor.

"Instead, they should sit out the current generation of WAP while planning their mobile Internet strategy," he said.

The report's title, WAP Usability - Deja Vu: 1994 All Over Again, refers to the fact that the study's findings are strikingly similar to usability studies conducted by Nielsen in 1994 at the beginning of the Web phenomena.

And he predicts that the evolution of Internet mobility will follow along the same analogy - as the technology gets easier to use, so too will it increase in popularity.

Still, that hasn't stopped Nielsen from trying to cash in on WAP. You can obtain your own copy of the study by downloading it from the Nielsen and Norman Web site here.

Although $18 to find out WAP is CWAP does seem a bit steep. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.