Feeds

Visa trial judge assumes authority over time and space

How to make the legal illegal

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Judge Jones, the federal judge presiding over the government's antitrust trial against Visa and Mastercard, has attempted to push the boundaries of law by insisting anyone who downloaded confidential trial documents accidentally posted to the Justice Department either destroy or return them.

Uncensored versions of 12 pieces of evidence appeared on the department's antitrust Web site on 4 August and stayed there until 14 September, during which time a number of people, including lawyers representing Wal-Mart in an upcoming case against Visa and Mastercard, downloaded them.

However, Judge Jones' edict that all copies be returned or destroyed has annoyed many, especially since they were lawfully obtained. The government doesn't make mistakes of course and Judge Jones was obviously aware of the damage a wide dissemination of the information would have on her case. Refusing to allow the files to be used as evidence in future trials would not be enough as the media would still be able to publish the evidence. Since it would then be in the public domain, the evidence could then be legitimately pulled into future trials through a different route.

The legal logic is clear, but how much right has Jones to make things illegal in retrospect? Well, every right, but would the decision stand up to a court case itself? It remains unclear whether any media companies will take her on - we suspect it will depend entirely on how juicy the information in the documents is.

The order was as follows: "All third parties informed of this order shall forthwith return or destroy all copies of documents that the government has stated were inadvertently posted on its Web site, as well as any other documents reflecting the confidential information contained therein." Plus, those who have passed on the info "shall ensure" that the receivers return or destroy the documents.

The government has accused the credit card giants of damaging consumer interests by stifling innovation and strong-arming banks not to accept rival cards. Jonesy has yet to give any indication as to when she will announce her decision. ®

Related Story

Visa to 'monitor' e-commerce security
Visa and Mastercard turn the screws on online fraudsters

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.