Feeds

Pro-Web filter politician changes track after his site is blocked

US Republican congressional candidate censored

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Remote control for virtualized desktops

A US Republican congressional candidate became the victim of his own campaigning after Web filters blocked traffic to his site.

Jeffery Pollock, a conservative Christian who waged an unsuccessful campaign for the Third Congressional District seat in Oregon, had been a staunch supporter of filters.

A statement on his site previously read: "We should demand that all public schools install and configure Internet filters."

But an outraged Pollock pulled down the statement after it turned out software from Cyber Patrol had been banning surfers from visiting his campaign site. He has now decided that he opposes government intervention when it comes to blocking sites.

"I just went back to my website to re-read what I wrote nine months ago. That will be gone. I am incensed with what is going on here," said Pollock when he discovered the action.

Some surfers who enabled the blocking capabilities for "Full Nudity", "Partial Nudity" or "Sexual Acts/Texts" were unable to gain access to Pollock's and other candidates' sites. In all, a study by Netelection.org and free speech group Peacefire.org found at least four Republican, one Libertarian, and five Democrat sites blocked by Cyber Patrol.

There was no obscenity on Pollock's site, although it is believed references to issues such as abortion, rape and incest may have triggered the filters. ®

Related LinksA copy of the study, entitled Blind Ballots: Websites of US political candidates censored by Censorware can be found here.

Staunch Christian Republicans can find Pollock's site here.

Related Stories
Net censorship row is a right cock-up
Spam filters don't work: Shock new survey
Porn, drugs and bomb-making sites slip through kiddie filters

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity
What really shortens lives? Reading this sort of crap in the papers
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.