Feeds

Son of StrongARM to ship next year

Intel Xscaling the heights

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intel's low power consumption XScale architecture will eventually replace StrongARM in Chipzilla's portfolio, Ron Smith, VP of the chip behemoth's wireless communication group, said today.

XScale has evolved from StrongARM - with which it is instruction set compatible - and which Intel has a unique licence to modify, according to Smith. The first handheld devices should appear in the second half of 2001 and feature extremely low power consumption - Intel is now referring to mW per MIP.

An XScale device should be able to deliver 1,000MIPs at 1.6volts and around 750MIPs at 1.3volts while consuming just 160mW of power.

The 0.18micron devices will feature a new power management system called Dynamic Voltage Management (DVM) which will increase voltage dynamically as processor load increases, such as when playing MPEG video, and drop back down when the CPU becomes more lightly loaded.

XScale devices will feature two power steps, the values of which will vary according to the performance of the device. High performance parts will switch between 1.6V and 1.3V, while lesser chips will run at either 1.0V or 0.75V.

Asked whether XScale had any rivals, Smith replied "Just one - StrongARM". ®

Related story

I/O, I/O, it's off to work we go

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.