Feeds

New York VC warns of more public dotcom deaths

But this will be cathartic

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Dotcoms should brace themselves for a fresh spate of public company collapses, a major New York venture capitalist warned today.

And it's not all the fault of the e-entrepreneurs - some of the venture capitalists are also to blame, according to Alan Patricof, chairman of Patricof & Co Ventures.

"We're going to see a lot of public failures," Patricof told eager attendees at today's Silicon Alley Venture Capital Summit in New York. "There are a lot more that are going to go - probably some of our own too."

He added that this process would "probably be cathartic" as too many dotcoms had floated which shouldn't have. "Today, we have a lot of companies with very young, immature business models," he said.

"I think the incubator programme has gone crazy. We don't need all these start-ups."

Patricof, who served as Chairman of Entrepreneurs for Clinton and Gore in the early nineties, said there was too much finance floating around from venture capitalists last year. And a lot of companies were going to fall when they started looking for the second round of funding because of unsustainable business models.

But he said that the dotcom whirlwind had changed the mindset of many venture capitalists - "A lot of companies were just trying to play the IPO game".

"The old metrics do apply - you have to make money."

Fred Wilson, managing partner at venture capitalist Flatiron Partners, added: "We all participated in the feeding frenzy."

"But I don't think we've failed, I think we've just failed to live up to unrealistic expectations."

Wilson reckons that the public market valuation for dotcoms is close to rock bottom - but represents a more realistic price - and will bounce around until Christmas before recovering "hopefully Spring, Summer next year". ®

Related Stories

Boxman implodes
Boo! Disgraced retail site back this month
Priceline buries two cash cows
Amazon business model flawed, says dotcom guru

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.