Feeds

Northamber lifts hatches and comes out to play

A display of financial prudence

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Northamber has released its year-end results and given a good indication of how its year of careful financial management has gone. Chairman David Phillips said: "These strong, rewarding results cover a protracted period of adverse and then lacklustre market conditions, pre and post the millennium."

He may be right or wrong about the market - but both Compel and Computacenter got nobbled by Y2K - but what is clear is that Northamber buttoned down the hatches this year and has maintained the same turnover as last year. In fact, sales nudged up slightly from £277.7 million last year to £284.3 million.

However, by greatly reducing the cash it held (down 80 per cent), increasing its debtors (up 20 per cent), reducing its creditors (down 10 per cent) and reducing its tangible assets (most likely the amount of stock held in warehouses - down 9 per cent), it managed to weed a lot more out of the same sales. Hence pre-tax profits are up 19.1 per cent to £7.52 million. This leads to a 28 per cent increase in earnings per share.

The company also, wisely, decided that its shares were undervalued and so bought back over 17 times the amount it purchased last year - nearly half a million quids worth. Shareholders are thanked with a 20 per cent rise in dividend to 6p.

So what of the future? Well, ole Dave first wants to explain why the results aren't sexier. He blames mostly Windows 2000 and faster Intel chips for not allowing the company to pick up on its service and maintenance business. That said, Northamber's "very high level of technical expertise and added value" remain the heart of the company. And that's about it really. Staff levels are down one person. The new financial year starts "on a more stable basis" and the Board is "confident of a successful outcome for the current year".

Exciting it's not but it is good business. ®

Related Stories

Y2K to blame for Compel profit slump
Y2K to blame for Computacenter profits slump
SCH bucks dealer doldrums

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.