Feeds

Intel invests in embedded Linux operation

Cash paid to promote development for XScale CPU

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intel is to pump money into embedded Linux software developer MontaVista to encourage development of OS and application code for its XScale processor.

Chipzilla's investment in MontaVista was announced yesterday, part of a $23 million cash injection from a number of VCs. The size of Intel's investment was not revealed.

XScale is the follow-up to Intel's StrongARM chip, aimed largely at mobile devices and embedded systems. Intel's investment, like its stake in LynuxWorks (formerly known as Lynx Real Time Systems), operates at two levels: it’s about promoting software development on one of its processor platforms, ideally resulting in greater chip sales. It also operates as a straightforward VC investment - the embedded space is highly lucrative, and Intel is banking on MontaVista growing significantly through is efforts in that market.

Income from smart investments is a growing part of most major IT companies' revenues, as they use spare cash to seek later rewards by banking on potential IPO successes.

Embedded Linux still has a certain financial lustre. Intel's investments in Linux companies include stakes in TurboLinux, SuSE, Red Hat, VA Linux Systems and eSoft. ®

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.