Feeds

AOL, Warner, EMI fail to calm Euro merger fears

Companies pledge not to stiffle competition for three years. Eh?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

The European Commission remains unsatisfied with attempts by AOL and Time Warner to make their proposed merger more palatable, an industry source has claimed.

Last week, it emerged that the EC's competition watchdog is set to block the merger, according to a leaked preliminary judgement. Following the leak, AOL, Time Warner and EMI - which is hoping to fold its music operation into Time Warner's own - said they would work to calm European fears that the mergers would "create a dominant position in the markets for online music... Internet dial-up access [and] broadband Internet."

However, the source, cited by Reuters, claim that they have failed to allay the Commission's concern that "effective competition" would be "significantly impeded" if the merger was allowed to proceed, as the draft EC report puts it.

According to the source, AOL offered to change its stake in AOL Europe, a joint venture with German media giant Bertelsmann, and to promise not to force content providers signing up with the US operation to sign exclusively to AOL Europe too, for a period of three years after the merger. EMI, meanwhile, pledged not to give preferential treatment to online music providers allied to AOL-Time Warner, for the same period. The promise, you'll note, only covers music, not other, potentially more lucrative content, such as movies.

You can see why the EC isn't happy: essentially the companies are admitting that they do indeed plan to provide EMI and Time Warner content exclusively over AOL's network, or at least make it harder to get that content from other sources. Sure, they won't do this for three years, but it's clear that that's what they intend once that period is passed.

In short, three years down the post-merger line, the AOL-Warner-EMI operation will become potentially as anti-competitive as the EC fears.

The EC's final verdict on the EMI/Warner merger will take place before 18 October, and on the AOL/Time-Warner by 24 October. Commission insiders, however, reckon the organisation's decisions will be revealed by 4 October. ®

Related Story

Europe to say no to AOL, Time-Warner, EMI merger

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.