Feeds

eGroups responds to child porn worries

"We will take all necessary steps"

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

We ran a story earlier about child porn pictures that were available on eGroups Web site. It has pulled the "kids porn" group since then, but we also discovered a members-only site which appears to offer worse.

While we recognise eGroups' stance that it cannot monitor everything on its site before it is posted, we remain concerned about the length of time is takes it to act. It also appears a little disturbing that no indication of action was given until the press/authorities were informed. We're sure this is merely coincidental and won't happen again.

Anyway, one reader sent several emails to eGroups outlining his concerns and we were cc'ed in on them and the subsequent reply from the company. This is the reply:

"Dear Mr. XXXXXX,

Thank you for your email in which you are informing us of child pornography content on egroups.co.uk. We will investigate this matter immediately.

All content on eGroups is of course not content published or condoned by eGroups, but always content published by users. eGroups is merely the technical platform, in this case the abused platform. Furthermore, all eGroups members are required to abide by our terms of service, which were clearly ignored in this case. We will not tolerate any abuse of our platform and service by anyone. Whenever we are notified of or become aware of illegal content by users on eGroups, as in this case, we take all necessary steps, including deleting the groups, if necessary, and passing information about illegal content on to the authorities.

Thank you again for your notification. In the future, please do not hesitate to contact me directly if you should become aware of problematic or even illegal content on eGroups.

Sincerely,
Marcus Riecke"

We don't what Marcus' job title is and are loathe to give out his personal email address for cases of abuse, but we have asked for a general abuse address where complaints can be registered. We'll update the story when eGroups gets back. ®

Related Stories

Egroups under fire for child porn pics

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.