Feeds

MP3.com damages to be set next week

Payout could be massive - or massively massive...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

US District Judge Jed S Rakoff will next week decide whether MP3.com wilfully used 5000-odd CDs owned by record label Universal without permission - and how much the online music company must pay up in damages.

The Judge's ruling is expected on Wednesday, and will come after four days' of testimony from both sides this week.

Judge Rakoff ruled earlier this year that MP3.com had infringed the copyrights of major labels when it compiled a database of over 80,000 CDs on which it based its MyMP3.com service. MyMP3.com allowed CD owners to listen to music they'd already purchased from any Web-connected PC anywhere in the world.

Even though MyMP3.com users were in spirit listening to music they own - just as if they ripped their own CDs to a portable digital music player - the labels contended that in practice they were listening to discs owned by MP3.com, to which they had no right. In short, MP3.com was engaging in copyright violation.

MP3.com will have argued that it believed it was in the right, and ask the Judge to impose a lenient fine. Certainly, Rakoff appears to be leaning that way, having already said that the company will be fined on the basis of the number of CDs it used, not the number of songs, a decision that could cut MP3.com's fine by a factor of ten.

Still, with some 5000 or more CDs in question, MP3.com is not going to walk away lightly, even if the judge imposes the minimum fine. That would still result in a payment to Universal of $3.75 million. At maximum, the fine could easily exceed $150 million. Judge Rakoff will also have to decide just how many copyrights MP3.com violated.

MP3.com is believed to have already paid out around $20 million apiece to EMI, Sony, Warner and BMG - all of whom, along with Universal, brought the copyright violation case in the first place - in private settlements. MP3.com this week blamed the lack of agreement with Universal because the label wants to put it out of business. ®

Related Stories

Universal wants us dead - MP3.com
Judge limits MP3.com copyright settlement payout
MP3.com offers to pull major label tracks from MyMP3.com
MP3.com vs RIAA judge explains his verdict
Court finds MP3.com guilty of copyright violation

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up Big Data
Solving backup challenges and “protect everything from everywhere,” as we move into the era of big data management and the adoption of BYOD.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?