Feeds

Survey: 70 per cent of Gnutella users are ‘free riding’

Less sharing, more snaring

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Napster and Gnutella are refuges for music fans who'd much rather take than give, according to a survey of Gnutella usage by the famous Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (Parc).

Parc researchers studied activity on the open source peer-to-peer file sharing tool Gnutella over a 24-hour period. They found that 70 per cent of users don't share any of their own files.

They also found that just one per cent of the users served almost half of the available tracks, and 25 per cent of users served 98 per cent of the requests for music files.

That should come as music to the ears of the recording industry, which is keen to block such services on the grounds they encourage piracy. Parc's research certainly suggest the service isn't the basis for a community of sharers that Napster and its proponents have suggested.

Of course, that doesn't invalidate Napster's argument that its service doesn't promote piracy, but it does suggests users are more interested in taking tracks than donating them. Anecdotal evidence suggests that sharers are more likely to buy music than takers (dubbed 'free riders' by the survey's authors) - and that backs the Recording Industry Association of America's argument against Napster.

The research also suggests that if so few are serving to so many, it becomes very hard to say that Napster or Gnutella are true peer-to-peer services.

Parc's motivation behind the survey, however, was more pragmatic: to measure the impact of Gnutella usage on the services' performance.

"The computers handling the bulk of queries may become unable to deal with all the traffic that is coming to them, which could potentially cause the system to fall and crash," warned Eytan Adar, who coauthored the study, in a Reuters report. ®

Related Stories

Napster usage stats support RIAA claims
Napster boosts music sales - survey

Check out The Register's full coverage of the Napster controversy here

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Premier League wants to PURGE ALL FOOTIE GIFs from social media
Not paying Murdoch? You're gonna get a right LEGALLING - thanks to automated software
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer quits Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.