Feeds

Intel backtracks on support forum closures

Updated Busy week for U turns at Chipzilla

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Hard on the heels of this week's decision to stab Rambus in the back [er, surely 'offer Pentium 4 users a choice of memory?' - Ed], comes another Intel U turn.

Chipzilla's unilateral decision a couple of weeks back to close all its support forii met with a storm of protest from regular users. Intel planned instead to deal with all technical queries by personal email.

Amongst the most vocal protestors were members of the motherboard support forum who were greeted with the following message when they logged in on July 18:

"Intel is announcing the closure of the Intel Motherboards for Pentium III or Pentium II processors support forum. The forum closure will begin July 28th, by transitioning to read-only for 2 weeks, then closing down completely on August 11th, 2000."

But now a different message appears:

"This forum was originally scheduled to close on August 14th, 2000. Based on the feedback received from our forum participants, Intel is re-evaluating the forum closure schedule and it will be updated at a later date. Please continue to use these forums according to their charter."

A similar missive would appear to exist on all other forums. We checked those for Pentium III, Celeron and Networking so it looks very much as if Intel is reacting to pressure from user demands, which can only be applauded.

But at the moment it isn't clear if this is a genuine change of heart or just a temporary reprieve. An Intel Europe spokesman said that the company was still evaluating the best strategy for providing support.

"It might be email, it might be a revamped forum with a list of FAQs," he said.

But it's a shame to have to report that Intel has once again acted in haste only to repent at leisure. ®

Related stories

Intel slams door on mobo support
Intel shuts stacks of web forums

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.