Feeds

US Congress meekly addresses workplace surveillance

Lame, popular, and easy to pass

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

US legislators in both Houses of Congress have proposed regulations which would require companies to notify employees if they monitor their computer, Internet or telephone use on the job, Reuters reports. The legislation would require employers to inform employees once each year about what information they are gathering and what they do with it.

More than 78 percent of large US firms monitor employee communications on the job, twice as many as reported doing so in 1997, the wire service notes.

The measure, introduced in the House of Representatives and Senate, would not force employers to change their surveillance habits and would not require them to notify employees each time they check on them personally.

Employees could sue for up to $20,000 if they found they were being monitored without their knowledge.

"We're not saying, 'abolish this practice'; we're just saying employees have a right to know when they're being watched," Reuters quotes Senator Charles Schumer (Democrat, New York) as saying.

The proposed regulation was introduced in the House by Representatives Bob Barr (Republican, Georgia) and Charles Canady (Republican, Florida), who also plan to grill FBI officials in hearings next week about the Bureau's surveillance system, Carnivore, which is used to monitor public e-mail traffic.

The FBI claims the system filters out innocent traffic to focus on specific suspects, but critics worry about its potential for abuse.

"It's part of the same overall issue," Barr said. "I think [surveillance] is a problem everywhere."

Because it doesn't place restrictions on the use of monitoring by corporate America, the measure should have an easy time getting through both Houses and reaching final harmony in Conference Committee. Call it a small, and rare, election-year concession to the individual. ®

Related coverage

ACLU seeks Congress' help against FBI's Carnivore
Reno gets her teeth into Carnivore

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.