Feeds

Cyberphobic Brits won't touch Net with yours

Twenty five per cent of population afflicted

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

A quarter of adult Brits will not touch the Internet with a bargepole, a survey has revealed.

Nearly 15 million have no plans to use the Web, with many people citing cost and sheer uselessness as the reasons behind their choice, according to the third Which? Online survey.

Whe are far from being a nation of Net luddites - 33 per cent of users are online for more than five hours per week and 64 per cent admit the Net has become part of everyday life, but it seems many are reluctant to jump on.

A wthird of the 2000 people questioned by Which? thought the Web was too expensive to use and offered them nothing relevant to their lives, while 25 per cent of Internet virgins said they didn't know what the Web was for.

The survey, conducted with the help of pollsters Mori, concluded that the UK's online population was around 13 million. Which? also said that poorer households were starting to go online to save their kids falling behind at school.

This clashed somewhat with a government survey released yesterday, which suggested a digital divide between Britain's more cash-strapped regions and the more affluent. According to the report from the Office of National Statistics, the number of households with Internet access has doubled in 12 months to 6.5 million. But just 3-6 per cent of poorer households are online - those with £270 a week - compared to 48 per cent of the better off - those earning more than £900 per week.

The survey, based on 7,000 UK households, also revealed huge regional differences. Affluent London and the south-east has an average 25 per cent of homes online, compared to 14 per cent in Scotland and the north-east, and just 11 per cent in Northern Ireland.

Which seemed to think that Internet access via TVs and mobile phones may get more people over their cyberphobia. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.