Feeds

Mobile masts not mortally threatening

According to this weeks research anyway

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Hard up schools which have decided to earn a bit of extra cash by letting a phone company stick a mast on their roof are OK.

The National Radiological Protection Board, NRPB, has published research indicating that children in schools with phone masts on the roof are not being exposed to dangerous levels of radio waves.

But kids are being zapped by waves coming through the window from nearby masts. But even these aren't doing any harm.

The report follows yesterday's World Health Organisation report on the safety of mobile phones, which also concluded that concerns were unfounded.

Seventeen school sites were investigated after parents raised concerns about mobile phone antennae being placed on the schools roofs. It transpires that school buildings themselves provide enough shielding from the radio waves to bring power density well below levels required by safely guidelines.

Meanwhile, in areas not shielded by buildings the power density did not drop significantly over 250 meters. This means that school kids were exposed to more radiation from other nearby sources through the schools windows than from the antenna overhead. Even this was an untroubling 0.002 per cent of the highest acceptable levels.

Using the technical data provided by the phone operators, the NRPB calculated theoretical safe distances from the phone masts at the 17 sites. Readings were then taken at 118 locations at the sites and the two sets of data were compared. This revealed that in areas out of the path of the main beam the operators had consistently overestimated the distances required to comply with safety regulations.

At present, over 500 schools have allowed masts to be installed on their grounds. A number of impoverished hospitals have also taken advantage of the ground rent phone companies are willing to pay.®

Related Story:

WHO says phones are safe

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
NASA launches new climate model at SC14
75 days of supercomputing later ...
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Stop the IoT revolution! We need to figure out packet sizes first
Researchers test 802.15.4 and find we know nuh-think! about large scale sensor network ops
DEATH by COMMENTS: WordPress XSS vuln is BIGGEST for YEARS
Trio of XSS turns attackers into admins
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
Driving business with continuous operational intelligence
Introducing an innovative approach offered by ExtraHop for producing continuous operational intelligence.
5 critical considerations for enterprise cloud backup
Key considerations when evaluating cloud backup solutions to ensure adequate protection security and availability of enterprise data.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?