Feeds

Afternic sues ICANN over domain-name status

Microsofteurope.co.uk? Who, us?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (the US-based outfit that accredits domain name registrars), is being sued by privately-held NYC-based Afternic.com because ICANN will not grant it domain-name registrar status.

ICANN says that when Afternic applied, it looked at its web site and found that the company was auctioning domain names similar to those of existing companies. Afternic said it was not responsible for the names, but it could hardly pretend it was unaware of what was going on. We had a glance, and found 37 names including "Microsoft", with microsofteurope.co.uk for $25,000 minimum (which is a bit useless because Microsoft Europe is headquartered in France) and microsoft-mcse.com for just $50, which throws an interesting light on someone's valuation of MCSE. It was gratifying to find that CheapRegister.com was on offer for $650, and Cash-Register.org for $500.

Afternic makes no secret of its criticism of ICANN, and has an active discussion forum devoted to such issues as the Universal Dispute Resolution Policy that was established to resolve disputes over cybersquatting. The company claims that Network Solutions and Register.com (no relation) were both auctioning domain names in cases where there had been registration but no payment or renewal.

ICANN has put Afternic's accreditation on hold - but has not directly refused it - and asked Afternic to find a solution to the cybersquatting issue. At first, Afternic was going to use a different company name for the registration activity, but then decided for some undisclosed reason that this would not work and so filed the suit.

A Manhattan federal court refused to agree that Afternic should be immediately accredited, and allowed ICANN to request that the case be transferred to Los Angeles, where ICANN is headquartered and where the application for accreditation was made.

There is another dispute between ICANN and those who register two-character country codes, since the legal authority for ICANN to collect money for any activity associated with non-US codes is distinctly questionable. Sooner or later, ICANN will need to be transformed into a UN agency like WIPO, one of the suppliers of arbitrators for the dispute resolution process. ®

New hybrid storage solutions

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
Forget silly privacy worries - help biometrics firms make MILLIONS
Beancounter reckons dabs-scanning tech is the next big moneypit
Microsoft's Office Delve wants work to be more like being on Facebook
Office Graph, social features for Office 365 going public
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.