Feeds

FCC balks at AOL/Time Warner wedding

Not using the M-word....yet

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

On Friday, just after AOL and Time Warner shareholders gave their overwhelming final blessing to the proposed $123 billion merger, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) spoiled the party by demanding additional information from both companies in its investigation into issues related to competition, Reuters reports.

The FCC is asking pointed questions about AOL's new television service, wondering what services AOL-TV subscribers will get, and what deals the company has made with cable operators. The Agency also requested information about AOL's investment in TiVo, a personal television service which allows viewers to schedule programming, the wire service says.

The FCC also wants to look into Time Warner's cable system and will examine documents related to plans for Road Runner, a joint venture owned by Time Warner, Microsoft and Compaq.

The Agency also asked for a list of all companies in which either AOL or Time Warner holds a stake of five per cent or more, as well as the price to be asked of ISPs to gain access to the merged company's cable systems.

And if that wasn't enough, US watchdog organisation Consumers Union announced Friday that it will challenge the ownership links between AT&T and the proposed AOL/Time Warner mono.... em, very large corporation.

Together, the companies would control more than half of the cable lines in the US, Consumers Union reckons. They would also control access to over half of the Internet subscribers who connect through standard modems and three-quarters of broadband customers.

"These transactions could allow AT&T and AOL/Time Warner to undercut competition and inflate cable and Internet charges," Consumers Union stated on Friday.

Precisely what the FCC seems to have in the back of its mind too, though few analysts expect it to reject the proposal outright. What we're seeing here is probably more of a 'close read' of the two companies' various projections and rosy promises, with an eye to closing the loopholes. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.