Feeds

Feds home in on AOL instant messaging

The Unprovable chases the Unreadable. IRC, anyone?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The Feds have stepped in to investigate AOL's dominance of the instant messaging business. The company operates the AIM and ICQ networks and has so far successfully fought off challenges from both Microsoft and open source messaging protocols.

But how much longer this good cop/bad cop tactic can hold out now looks questionable.

The Wall Street Journal reports that FTC has requested information, prompted by the Time Warner merger rolling towards completion. Yup, you're hearing right - that tie-up was announced six months ago, and the legal beagles are only just getting round to considering the effects for consumers and business rivals.

AOL has 150 million users for its instant messaging software, all of whom must be registered with the company. The company has responded with a threefold approach – by physically blocking predatory rivals such as Microsoft and Yahoo! (arguing that it compromises the users' passwords); by doing deals with smaller rivals such as Novell and Earthlink, and by making half-hearted gestures towards punting IM, or ICQ, or whatever you want as some kind of industry standard, OK, so will you all now go away please?

On the upside, it has to be said, AOL has done little to discourage cloners: ICQ clients exist for almost every platform – with varying degrees of functionality – and many of these include the ability to register with the network. So presumably, AOL reckons that the killer feature in its 'real' ICQ is the that audio feedback of the sound of typewriter keys as you clatter out a message.

But that's by the by...

We read this as more of a warning shot that Time Warner and AOL shouldn’t take their merger for granted. It certainly makes for a tricky potential prosecution for the FTC.

Since AOL isn't preventing anyone else from doing business, the Feds would have to argue that its messaging communities generate the same kind of network effect that a long-standing, well established OS platform has. In other words, that you can start your own IRC+ messaging service, but it won’t be worth it, as the pervs/Bjork fans/trainspotters [delete where applicable] are already too deeply hooked into AOL communities that they won’t bail out.

Um, we’d like to see them try that one, but we’re not holding our breath. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
Return of the Jedi – Apache reclaims web server crown
.london, .hamburg and .公司 - that's .com in Chinese - storm the web server charts
Chrome 38's new HTML tag support makes fatties FIT and SKINNIER
First browser to protect networks' bandwith using official spec
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.