Feeds

Outlook Love Bug patch still mysteriously missing

How long does it take to pour quick-set over attachments anyway?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Users are still waiting for a fix for MS Outlook after the ravages from the ILOVEYOU, Melissa and related viruses. Microsoft is itself in a bit of a fix here; having pushed the idea of attachments, a security fix based on blocking all attachments seems like a massive climb-down.

But on the other hand, what else could you do? Microsoft initially announced a patch that would drastically curtail Outlook's ability to deal with attachments, but for some reason, it hasn't actually got it out the door yet. It's been delayed several times already, and it's not clear when it will actually ship - or indeed, what it will actually be.

Meanwhile, the Microsoft's Office Update site has some extraordinary things to say about all it.

Curiously, the wording of Microsoft's announcement is in the present tense: the security update "puts you back in control of your software", despite the fix being "available soon" (this week is the latest rumour); it will provide "unprecedented security". Microsoft says that "malicious hackers have abused legitimate Outlook functionality". The company goes on to say that the bug fix ("update") was "not created to address a security vulnerability within Outlook". So why a "security update", then? The thinking seems to be that Outlook is perfectly safe if people behave themselves, but that the patch provides "unprecedented security protection" because there are people around who want to spoil things for everybody.

Microsoft is having to incorporate a number of restrictions on functionality, to change default settings, and even more difficult, to persuade users to download the bug fix and install it. It's unrealistic to expect many users to do this, especially as the documentation available so far is daunting. The chances of the right security decisions being made will not be particularly high in many cases, in view of the level of knowledge required to do this correctly. ®

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.