Feeds

MS ‘due process’ denial claim called hogwash

Only O J Simpson had as much

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

MS on Trial When Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson demanded that Microsoft reply to the revised DoJ break-up proposal within a matter of days, the company Dream Team began putting it about that this amounted to a denial of due process. They had heaps more evidence to present explaining why a break-up would spell catastrophe for Western Civilisation - maybe a good six months' worth - and by cutting them short the judge was denying them their right to a fair hearing, they claimed.

Utter rubbish, anti-trust lawyer and Penn State University assistant professor of economics Richard Hawkins snorts. "The only defendant who got as much 'process' was O J Simpson."

Judge Jackson's willingness to entertain any further company 'input' is a courtesy, not a requirement, Hawkins says. Jackson's findings of fact are more than adequate to support ordering a structural remedy.

"I could teach an entire course on anti-trust law from the findings of fact alone," Hawkins says. "I can't think of a single anti-trust violation not mentioned in it."

While his conclusions of law are subject to challenge in the appellate process to come, his findings of fact are not. For an appellate court to overturn him, they would have to find that no rational person would have ruled the same.

"I put the chance of that happening between slim and none," Hawkins says. It's virtually inconceivable that Microsoft will be rescued from the stigma of being found a monopoly according to the Sherman Act.

Thus Judge Jackson already has a more than adequate foundation on which to stand in ordering a structural remedy, and is under no obligation to take, or read, or be at all influenced by anything the company might offer.

Or, as it happens, by anything the DoJ might offer, though for numerous practical reasons he would be unlikely to order a three-way split over the Department's objections.

It is the DoJ which will have to prosecute the government's case in the appeals courts. It only makes sense that they be ordered to prosecute a case they support. DoJ lawyer David Boies' official line on preferring the two-way split is convenience of implementation; but the true reason is likely to be convenience of prosecution.

Appellate courts might construe trisection as an excessive remedy. Prosecution could be delayed, or even undermined, as the judges (or Justices) hash out the comparative merits of creating two or three Beasts.

The appeals process is a good deal more fluid in terms of tinkering with conclusions of law. Appellate courts are far from reluctant to put their own stamp on landmark cases. So while it's all but certain that Jackson's findings of fact and subsequent order of a structural remedy will withstand appellate review quite well, a two-way split looks least likely to encounter obstacles as the case moves inevitably up the legal food chain.

This is not to say that Jackson cannot, or will not, order the three-way remedy he so clearly favours. It is to say that in doing so he would greatly multiply DoJ's labours in the appellate courts; but as to whether or not he cares about that, we would not dare to guess. And besides, later this week we're likely to find out. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
It may be ILLEGAL to run Heartbleed health checks – IT lawyer
Do the right thing, earn up to 10 years in clink
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.