Feeds

The three flavours of Intel's Willamette chip

And the sad truth about the 1GHz CuMine III

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

The roadmap which has provided us with so much interest this week, is also interesting about Willamette and the way the Pentium III CuMine platform will gradually be displaced by the next rev of IA-32 architecture.

In fact, according to notes we took, there will be a total of three Willamettes available by the first quarter of 2001, one at 1.3GHz, one at 1.4GHz, and one at or over 1.5GHz.

The 1GHz Intel Pentium III, according to our notes, will be "available for business and consumer SKUs in Q3 this year".

As we reported last month, engineering samples of the Tehama chipset are available right now, and it is currently sampling on A1 MCH and BO ICH2 steppings. "Early indicators are that the silicon is healthy," the roadmap says.

Production samples of Tehama will be available in either June or July, will delivery expected one to two weeks ahead of Willamette production samples, and Intel is aligning this with the intro of the microprocessor.

How much will Willamette and Foster cost? According to the roadmap, the entry price will be less than $1,000. Intel will intro one of its trailing processor SKU cunning plans to take advantage of the Pentium III branded demand. The 6xxMHz space is seen as a particularly lucrative area.

What are the so-called "sweet spots" for people making PCs? In the performance area, in Q4, it will be the movement towards 1.5GHz Willamettes, using Kinnereth and Gamla connectivity. In Q3 it will be the Pentium III 1GHz using the 820E chipset and employing Gilad and Kinnereth connectivity.

We were a bit puzzled as to the nature of one block we saw, which suggested that the Pentium III to 1GHz will be supported by two 820E flavours -- MTH 2+2 and the MTH 0+2. But we suspect that the problems with the memory translator hub make this block now suspect -- seeing as the roadmap we saw was dated mid-April.

Desktop machines in the $2000+ area (excluding monitor), will use Willamette. While there will also be high end Pentium IIIs in this space then, by Q1 of 2001, Tehama-Willamette will rule the roost. ®

To see the rest of this week's Intel scoops, including the Itanium launch date and prices, go to our Semiconductor Section

New hybrid storage solutions

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Forget silly privacy worries - help biometrics firms make MILLIONS
Beancounter reckons dabs-scanning tech is the next big moneypit
Microsoft's Office Delve wants work to be more like being on Facebook
Office Graph, social features for Office 365 going public
Alibaba swings a large one with STONKING IPO legal bills
Chinese e-commerce beast searches for $21bn from investors
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.