Feeds

MS pulls legacy hardware drivers from Windows ME

Nearly ready to roll, download the wheels for yourself...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Windows Millennium Edition (WinME) is virtually ready to ship, according to a report at Win98Central. But the latest version of the code doesn't include drivers for legacy hardware, which strongly suggests Microsoft intends to make the break with the next (and last?) rev of the Win9x code. According to the site, the latest version of the WinME code is "post beta," i.e. pretty much operational. Other sources tell us that Microsoft accidentally released beta 3 RC1 on Saturday, then pulled it, so this is probably the code Win98Central's writer has got hold of. Millennium does seem to be prone to accidental premature releases - this is the second time it's happened during the development process. The OS itself isn't expected to ship until at least late May, but since it was downgraded to approximately the status of a Win9x service pack last year, there's no real obstacle to Microsoft having code ready early. The current code has IE and Outlook Express 5.5, the MovieMaker program which allows you to edit videos, and a few Win2k-style components, including a hibernate function. It removes real mode Dos, but doesn't otherwise make significant progress in terms of legacy removal, so you could think of the removal of driver code from the OS (if that's how it's going to ship) as a kind of legacy removal by axe. Microsoft itself currently faces both ways as regards WinME and legacy. It says that Windows 95/98 and NT 4.0 "do not support legacy-free modes of operation," and that designs with "no legacy hardware parts" will require Win2k or WinME. But although these two support legacy-free systems, they will also run on current systems. That's if you can still get the drivers, of course. Microsoft also expects early "legacy-free" systems, like early legacy-free supporting OS code, to have "components removed from the user's perspective" that aren't removed entirely, really, just hidden. Here's the justification: "The main benefit of legacy-free design is in not exposing legacy components to users. A user who does not have access to these components is prevented from getting into problems with system configuration and usage." Logically, this surely means that tech support in the future should deliberately lie to people about the capabilities of their hardware, right? ® See also: Win98Central story

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
NSA mass spying reform KILLED by US Senators
Democrats needed just TWO more votes to keep alive bill reining in some surveillance
'Internet Freedom Panel' to keep web overlord ICANN out of Russian hands – new proposal
Come back with our internet! cries Republican drawing up bill
What a Mesa: Apple vows to re-use titsup GT sapphire glass plant
Commits to American manufacturing ... of secret tech
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
Seattle children’s accelerates Citrix login times by 500% with cross-tier insight
Seattle Children’s is a leading research hospital with a large and growing Citrix XenDesktop deployment. See how they used ExtraHop to accelerate launch times.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?