Feeds

Sun hits back at Intel Itanium tale…

Smoky mirrors hide transparent Intel intent

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

RISC chip manufacturer Sun has hit back at Intel for its statements about the future of Solaris on the IA-64 platform. At the Intel Developer Forum held in a desert location a fortnight back, a whispering campaign from Chipzilla spin doctors led to an unseemly row where Sun was cast as the villain because it was not putting any muscle into porting applications for the Itanium big boxes. But, behind the scenes, The Register was given to understand that there was a little jealousy at Sun continuing to win big contracts in the US, with its UltraSparc platform, at the expense of other Itanium partners, including HP and Compaq. Now Sun has gone public on its views on the spat, with a public relations representative in the US wing of the firm denying Intel's rationale for the campaign. The representative said: "What is Intel going to do for those customers that have expressed a desire to use Solaris to bring IA-64 to market? "Intel's claims about lack of support from Sun are a smokescreen the industry should see through. Solaris 8 is ready for Itanium, we're going to give it and the source away for free. Those are moves designed to help the Intel environment most." The representative added: "By the way, 80 per cent of those [customers] who've responded to date (and we're talking thousands here) have asked for Intel versions." Intel's IA-64 architecture manager, Steve Smith, and senior Intel VP Paul Otellini, both suggested that Sun's heart was not in the platform, with the latter suggesting that other RISC vendors, such as HP and IBM, had already crossed the Rubicon river. As we suggested at the time, it is unclear whether Compaq, with its Alpha microprocessor and its Wildfire platform, is on the right side of the Rubicon or the wrong side. ® See also Solaris for Itanium looking dead flakey Risc vendors have Rubicon to cross Itanium: the beat goes on Intel Developer Forum Q1 2000

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.